土地增值收益分配对比研究:征收与集体经营性建设用地入市

A comparative study on land value-added revenue between mode of collecting and collecting land for urban construction into market

为明确征收和集体经营性建设用地入市2种模式不同主体获得土地增值收益差异,本文定性分析了2种模式土地增值收益的形成机制,并选择已有集体经营建设用地入市案例的试点区定量测算了2种模式增值收益的差异.研究结果显示:1)集体经营性建设用地入市制度主要通过简化交易环节、减少交易主体以及改变政府定价机制等措施建立了市场交易机制,充分实现土地增值收益;2)征收模式下农民集体获取的土地增值收益比例约为23%,而在集体经营性建设用地入市中,在政府收取较高的土地收益调节金时,农民集体获得的土地增值收益水平为20%~85%,而在政府收取较低的调节金时,农民集体获得的土地增值收益水平为70%~95%;3)集体经营性建设用地入市模式下农民集体获取的土地增值收益均高于政府取得的土地增值收益,有效增加了农民收益.

In the present paper difference between land acquisition and value of land acquisition was clarified,formation mechanism of two modes of land value-added income was analyzed.The pilot area was chosen to assess the difference between two patterns of added values.Both qualitative analysis and quantitative method were used.The system of collective management of land use was found to be mainly through the process of simplifying the transaction,reducing the main body of transaction and changing government pricing mechanism and other measures to establish a market trading mechanism,to ensure the full realization of land value-added benefits.The proportion of land value-added income acquired by farmers collectively was found to be about 23%.In the case of collective management of land acquisition,when government collects higher land income adjustment fund,85%,and the government charges a lower adjustment fee,the farmers collectively got the land value-added income level 70%-95%.Under the mode of collective management of land use,the land value gains obtained by farmers collectively were higher than those obtained by the government,and the farmersincome was effectively increased.