期刊文献+

Patient Trust in Physicians: Empirical Evidence from Shanghai, China 被引量:9

Patient Trust in Physicians: Empirical Evidence from Shanghai, China
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Patient trust in physicians, which can be considered a collective good, is necessary tot an effective health care system. However, there is a widespread concern that patient trust in physicians is declining under various threats to the physician patient relationship worldwide. This article aimed to assess patient trust in physicians through a quantitative study in Shanghai, China, and to provide appropriate suggestions for improving the trust in China. Methods: The data from a survey conducted in Zhongshan Hospital and Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital which are two tertiary public hospitals in Shanghai, were used in this study. Patient trust in physicians was the dependent variable. Furthermore, a 10-item scale was used to precisely describe the dependent variable. The demographic characteristics were independent variables of trust in physicians. Binomial logistic regression was employed to analyze the fhctors associated with the dependent variable, which was divided into two categories on the basis of the responses (1: Strongly agree or agree and 0: Strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral). Results: This study tbund that 67% of patients trusted or strongly trusted physicians. The mean score of patient trust in physicians was 35.4 from a total score of 50. Furthermore, patient trust in physicians was significantly correlated with the age, education level, annual income, and health insurance coverage of the patients. Conclusions: Patient trust in physicians in Shanghai, China is higher than previously reported. Furthermore, the most crucial reason for patient distrust in physicians is the information asymmetry between patients and physicians, which is a natural property of the physician patient relationship, rather than the so-called for-profit characteristic of physicians or patients' excessive expectations. Background: Patient trust in physicians, which can be considered a collective good, is necessary tot an effective health care system. However, there is a widespread concern that patient trust in physicians is declining under various threats to the physician patient relationship worldwide. This article aimed to assess patient trust in physicians through a quantitative study in Shanghai, China, and to provide appropriate suggestions for improving the trust in China. Methods: The data from a survey conducted in Zhongshan Hospital and Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital which are two tertiary public hospitals in Shanghai, were used in this study. Patient trust in physicians was the dependent variable. Furthermore, a 10-item scale was used to precisely describe the dependent variable. The demographic characteristics were independent variables of trust in physicians. Binomial logistic regression was employed to analyze the fhctors associated with the dependent variable, which was divided into two categories on the basis of the responses (1: Strongly agree or agree and 0: Strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral). Results: This study tbund that 67% of patients trusted or strongly trusted physicians. The mean score of patient trust in physicians was 35.4 from a total score of 50. Furthermore, patient trust in physicians was significantly correlated with the age, education level, annual income, and health insurance coverage of the patients. Conclusions: Patient trust in physicians in Shanghai, China is higher than previously reported. Furthermore, the most crucial reason for patient distrust in physicians is the information asymmetry between patients and physicians, which is a natural property of the physician patient relationship, rather than the so-called for-profit characteristic of physicians or patients' excessive expectations.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第7期814-818,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This work was supported by grants from National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 13CGL135), and the Humanities and Sciences Cross-disciplinary Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No. 14JCY04).
关键词 Patient Trust Physician Patient Relationship Public Hospital Patient Trust Physician Patient Relationship Public Hospital
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Safran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, Rogers WH, Taira DH, Lieberman N, et aL Yhe primary care assessment survey: Tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care 1998;36:728-39. doi: 10.109700005650-199805000-00012.
  • 2Bachinger SM, Kolk AM, Smets EM. Patients trust in their physician- Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the "Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale". Patient Educ Couns 2009;76:126-31. doi: 10.1016j.pec.2008.11.020.
  • 3Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q 2001:79:613-39, v. doi: 10.11111468-0009.00223.
  • 4Ommen O, Janssen C, Neugebauer E, Bouillon B, Rehm K, Rangger C, et aL Trust, social support and patient type - Associations between patients perceived trust, supportive communication and patients preferences in regard to paternalism, clarification and participation of severely injured patients. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:196-204. doi: 10.1016j.ec.2008.03.016.
  • 5Hall MA. Law, medicine, and trust. Stanford Law Rev 2002;55:101-63. doi: 10.23071229596.
  • 6lllingworth P. Trust: The scarcest of medical resources..I Med Philos 2002:27:31-46. doi: I 0.1076j mep.27.1.31.2969.
  • 7Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients trust in medical care and their physicians. J AMA 1996;275:1693-7. doi: I 0.100 ljama.275.21.1693.
  • 8Davies HT, Rundall TG. Managing patient trust in managed care. Milbank Q 2000;78:609-12. doi: 10.11111468-0009.00187.
  • 9Jiang Y, Ying X, Kane S, Mukhopadhyay M, Qian X. Violence against doctors in China. Lancet 2014;384:744-5. doi: 10.1016 s0140-6736( 14)61438-0.
  • 10Ozawa S, Sripad R How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2013;91:10-4. doi: 10.1016j.socscimed.2013.05.005.

同被引文献64

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部