期刊文献+

Community in the information age: Exploring the social potential of web-based technologies in landscape architecture and community design

Community in the information age: Exploring the social potential of web-based technologies in landscape architecture and community design
原文传递
导出
摘要 Critics have pointed at new technologies as cutprits in the decline of civic life, neighboring and social capital construction in Western societies. When applied to community design and ptanning processes, technologies can empower residents to actively engage in decision-making, foster connections across social groups, with positive consequences on life and sociatization in public spaces. What kind of participation do technotogies foster? And is it the kind that bridges social and ideotogical divides? The 2012 community design process for Hawthorne Park in Medford, Oregon illustrates many of the challenges and opportunities connected to the use of new technologies in design. In the process, technologies were instrumental in enlisting a larger-than-usual number of residents to participate in the design of the park. Blogs and online questionnaires were successful in gathering people's thoughts on the design choices being made, but also favored a limited, intermittent form of engagement. The results are synthesized in principles for the successful integration of web-based technologies in future community design efforts: adaptability, fuji participation, nuanced participation and the need for links to the physical realm. Critics have pointed at new technologies as cutprits in the decline of civic life, neighboring and social capital construction in Western societies. When applied to community design and ptanning processes, technologies can empower residents to actively engage in decision-making, foster connections across social groups, with positive consequences on life and sociatization in public spaces. What kind of participation do technotogies foster? And is it the kind that bridges social and ideotogical divides? The 2012 community design process for Hawthorne Park in Medford, Oregon illustrates many of the challenges and opportunities connected to the use of new technologies in design. In the process, technologies were instrumental in enlisting a larger-than-usual number of residents to participate in the design of the park. Blogs and online questionnaires were successful in gathering people's thoughts on the design choices being made, but also favored a limited, intermittent form of engagement. The results are synthesized in principles for the successful integration of web-based technologies in future community design efforts: adaptability, fuji participation, nuanced participation and the need for links to the physical realm.
出处 《Frontiers of Architectural Research》 CSCD 2016年第1期15-26,共12页 建筑学研究前沿(英文版)
关键词 Landscape architec-ture Urban design Social capital PubLic outreach Community design PARTICIPATION Landscape architec-ture Urban design Social capital PubLic outreach Community design Participation
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Al-Kodmany, K., 1999. Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, imptemen- ration, and evaluation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 45 (1), 37-45.
  • 2Apostot, I., Antoniadis, R, Banerjee, T., 2013. FlAneriebetween net and place promises and possibilities for participation in plan- ning. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 33 (1), 20-33.
  • 3Calhoun, C.I 2-O07_Co-mmu-nity- witho-u-t p-ropinquity revisited: com- munications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociol. Inq. 68 (3), 373-397.
  • 4Cammaerts~ B., Carpentier, 'N., 2C)05. The Unbearable lightness of fuU participation in a global context. WSlS and civil society participation. Towards a sustainable Information Society: Decon- structing WSIS, 17-55.
  • 5CastelIs, M., 1996. The information age: economy, society and culture. The Rise of Network Societies, Vol. 1. Blackwell, London.
  • 6CasteUs, M., Cardoso, G., 2006. The Network Society: From Knowl- edBe to Policy. Center for Transatlantic Relations, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Baltimore, 3-23.
  • 7City of Medford Oregon, 2013. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from (http://www.ci.medford.or.us/).
  • 8D~jeant-Pons, M., 2006. The European landscape convention. Landsc. Res. 31 (4), 363-384.
  • 9De Tocquevitle, A., 2003. Democracy in America. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd, Clark, NJ.
  • 10Dunn, C.E., 2007. Participatory GIS - a people's GIS? Pros. Hum. Geosr. 31 (5), 616-637.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部