管辖异议权再审程序之否定

The Negation of Jurisdiction Objection on Retrial

管辖权异议作为管辖错误的一种救济制度,其价值和目的都应当反映管辖制度的目的和价值,对滥用管辖权异议制度的评价应当在管辖权异议制度的制度目的和价值前提下做出。管辖异议权作为一种程序性的救济权利,其救济的管辖错误并不具备适用再审救济的可能性和必要性。本文通过最高人民法院公报案例引入管辖权异议制度不适用于再审程序的观点,并以判例为观点的佐证,通过对管辖权制度的理解,丰富了这一观点的说理。

Considering the effect of jurisdiction objection on the jurisdictional error, jurisdiction objection should abide by the value and purpose of jurisdiction system. When it comes to the judgment of abusing jurisdiction objection, the above-mentioned value and purpose need to be followed as well. There is no possibility and necessity for parties to apply for retrial against a final ruling on jurisdiction objection, because jurisdiction objection can only be applied to the procedural error. This article aims to support the argument that jurisdiction objection is not suitable on retrial by analyzing the case issued on the Gazette of the Supreme People＇s Court.