期刊文献+

英国战略环评有效性评估方法发展与挑战

The Development and Challenges of Effectiveness Assessment Methods for SEA in the UK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以文献综述的形式介绍了英国战略环评有效性的发展,指出目前评价有效性常用的四个维度:程序有效性、实质有效性、成本有效性和规范有效性。同时概括了在研究战略环评有效性评估方法过程中发现的问题和挑战。根据未来发展趋势,提出了提高战略环评有效性的三个方法,分别是:简化评价方法、鼓励公众参与和有效进行环评后的监控。 The aim of this paper is to discuss four assessment dimensions and the development history of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) effectiveness research in the UK, and summarize the current problems and challenges as well as future development trends. A literature review approach is conducted for identifying four assessment dimensions: procedural effectiveness, substantive effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and normative effectiveness. Simplifying assessment approaches, encouraging public participation and post-SEA monitoring arc proposed to enhance the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in the future.
作者 任伟 席俊洁
出处 《环境影响评价》 2016年第2期53-56,共4页 Environmental Impact Assessment
关键词 英国 战略环评 有效性 评估方法 UK strategic environmental assessment effectiveness assessment method
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Sadler B. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment Final Report Environmental Assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance [ R ]. Canada: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 1996.
  • 2International Association for Impact Assessment. Strategic Environmental Assessment Performance criteria[ EB/OL]. (2002 - 01 ) [ 2015 - 06 - 14 ]. http://www, iaia. org/publicdocuments/ special-publications/spl, pdf.
  • 3Fischer T B, Gazzola P. SEA effectiveness criteria-equally valid in all countries? The case study of Italy[ J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2006, 26(4) : 396-409.
  • 4Wang H, Bai H, Liu J, et al. Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing Strategic Environmental Assessment effectiveness[ J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 23 (4) : 413-420.
  • 5Van Doren D, Driessen P, Schijf B, et al. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: Towards a better understanding [ J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013,38 ( 1 ) : 120-130.
  • 6Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Howitt R. Sustainability assessment: pluralism, practice and progress[ M]. London: Routledge, 2013.
  • 7Therivel R. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action [ M ]. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan, 2010.
  • 8Jones C, Baker M., Carter J, et al. Strategic Environmental Assessment and Land Use Planning. An international evaluation [ M ]. London : Earthscan, 2005.
  • 9Thorivel R, Minas P. Ensuring effective sustainability appraisal[ J]. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2002, 20(2): 81-91.
  • 10Zhou K Y, Sheate W R. Case studies: Application of SEA in provincial level expressway infrastructure network planning in China-Curent existing problems [ J ]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2011, 31 (6): 521-537.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部