摘要
高亨在朱熹的"变卦法"基础上,提出了"宜变之爻",极富创意。王亭之则在高亨的基础上,推演出自己的"宜变之爻"。前贤对"之八"、"皆八"有着不同看法,大致可分为在《周易》系统中解和《周易》系统外解、从筮数解和非筮数解等区别。高、王二氏通过"宜变之爻",对"艮之八"、"泰之八"、"贞屯悔豫皆八"提出了自己的见解。纵观诸多关于"之八""皆八"的观点,以"宜变之爻"来解读至今依旧是较为重要和合理的见解。
Gao Hen presented the opinion of " The Yao that should be chartged" was based on the "hexagrams rescheduling method" of Zhu Xi, and is creative. Then Wang Tingzhi deduced his own "hexagram of appropriate change" based on Gao Hen's opinion. The predecessors had different views on "the eight" and "eight all", which can be roughly divided into the differences between such as defined the solutions inside o hexagram of appropriate change r outside of the system of "The Book of Changes", within or without divinatory number etc. Gao and Wang presented their own opinions on "eight of Gen", "eight of Tai", "eight all in Tun and Yu" through their "appropriate change of hexagram". Throughout many points of view of "the eight" and " eight all", to interpret them with " hexagratn of appropriate change" is still an important and reasonable way.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期164-170,共7页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
宜变之爻
之八
皆八
Hexagram of Appropriate Change
the Eight
Eight All