摘要
目的比较CURB一65评分和强化CURB评分对老年重症社区获得性肺炎(severe community acquired pneumonia,SCAP)预后的临床预测价值。方法回顾性分析2009—12—2015-07入住我院急诊科、呼吸内科以及老年呼吸内科的87例老年SCAP相关临床资料,分别统计每例患者的CURB-65评分、强化CURB评分,以患者28d预后为临床观察终点,绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线,通过比较曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分析两种评分工具对老年SCAP预后的预测价值。结果87例患者CURB一65评分为3(2—3)分,强化CURB评分为11(10~12)分。死亡组中CURB-65评分和强化CURB评分均明显高于存活组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。强化CURB评分AUC为0.722,最佳截断值为12,敏感度为58.82%,特异度为69.81%,P=0.0001;CURB-65评分AUC为0.660,最佳截断值为3,敏感度为73.53%,特异度为49.06%,P=0.0091。强化CURB评分AUC大于CURB-65评分,差异有统计学意义(0.722vs.0.660,Z=2.176,P=0.029)。结论CURB-65评分和强化CURB评分均可预测老年SCAP预后,强化CURB评分预测价值高于CURB-65评分,且其特异度高于CURB-65评分。
Objective To compare the values of CURB -65 and enhanced CURB scores in predicting mortality in older adults with severe community - acquired pneumonia. Methods A retrospective study of total 87 older adults with severe community - acquired pneumonia hospitalized into emergency department, respiratory and elderly respiratory from December 2009 to July 2015 were analyzed, CURB- 65 and enhanced CURB scores were calculated respectively. According to prognosis of 28 days for the end of observation, drawing the receiver- operating characteristic(ROC) curve of the two scores and comparing their area under the curve (AUC) to determine the predictive value of prognosis. Results The CURB - 65 and enhanced CURB scores of 87 patients were 3 (2 - 3 ) and 11 ( 10 ~ 12) respectively. The CURB -65 and enhanced CURB scores of the death group were higher than those of the survival group(P 〈0.05). The AUC of enhanced CURB score was 0.722, the best cut - off value was 12 (sensitivity 58.82%, specificity 69.81%, P = 0001 ) ;the AUC of CURB -65 score was 0. 660, and the best cut - off value was 3 ( sensitivity 73.53%, specificity 49.06%, P = 0. 0091 ). The AUC of enhanced CURB was larger than that of CURB - 65 (0. 722 vs. 0. 660,Z = 2. 176,P = 0.029). Conclusion CURB -65 and enhanced CURB scores all can predict the mortality of the older patients with SCAP, but enhanced CURB performs better than CURB -65 ,because the specificity is higher than that of the CURB - 65 score.
出处
《中国急救医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第3期238-241,共4页
Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
基金
国家级临床重点专科建设项目经费资助