期刊文献+

犹豫模糊语言的可能度排序方法 被引量:12

Possibility degree methods for ranking hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究犹豫模糊语言集可能度排序方法.在给出犹豫模糊语言集排序可能度公理的基础上,给出3类犹豫模糊语言集可能度排序公式:第1类基于RL的5个等价犹豫模糊语言可能度排序公式;第2类基于WNS的5个等价犹豫模糊语言可能度排序公式;第3类基于概率可信度的犹豫模糊语言可能度比较公式.通过实例对3类公式进行对比分析,给出方法选择的建议,第3类方法可以区别差别较小的犹豫模糊语言数,第1类方法适于大规模计算中的应用. Possibility degree methods for ranking hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets(HFLTSs) are studied. Three kinds of possibility degree formulas are proposed based on presenting possibility degree axiom. The five mutual equivalent formulas of the first kind are based on the idea of the interval comparison method. Another five mutual equivalent formulas are proposed based on the first kind of formulas, and the third kind of possibility degree formulas with respect to HFLTSs is proposed by probability criterion of uniform distribution. Finally, an example is given to explain the rationality and feasibility of the new formulas. The results show that the third kind of formula can deal with ranking problems resulting from slight difference of HFLTS, and the first kind of formula is simple to calculate and suitable for large-scale computation.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期640-646,共7页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71371107) 江苏省高校哲学社科项目(2013SJD630039)
关键词 犹豫模糊语言 可能度 排序 hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets possibility degree ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Rodr′iguez Rosa M, Mart′inez Luis, Herrera Francisco, et al. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 20(1): 109-119.
  • 2Rodr′iguez Rosa M, Mart′inez Luis, Herrera Francisco, et al. A group decision making model dealing with comparative expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 241(8): 28-42.
  • 3Wang Jianqiang, Wang Jing, Chen Qinghui, et al. An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 280(10): 338-351.
  • 4Liu Hongbin, Rodr′iguez Rosa M. A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multi-criteria decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 258(2): 220-238.
  • 5Zhu Bin, Xu Zeshui. Consistency measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(1): 34-35.
  • 6Liu Hongbin, Cai Jianfeng, Jiang Le. On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relation based on comparative Linguistic expressions[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2014, 29(6): 544-559.
  • 7Beg Ismat, Tabasam Rashid. TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2013, 28(12): 1162-1171.
  • 8Liao Huchang, Xu Zeshui, Zeng Xiaojun. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 271(7): 125-142.
  • 9Lee Liwei, Chen Shyiming. Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 294(2): 513-529.
  • 10Lee Liwei, Chen Shyiming. Fuzzy decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets[J]. Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Berlin: Springer-Heidelberg, 2013, 7802: 21-30.

二级参考文献42

  • 1吴江.群组区间数互补判断矩阵偏好信息的一种集结方法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(6):500-503. 被引量:24
  • 2魏毅强,刘进生,王绪柱.不确定型AHP中判断矩阵的一致性概念及权重[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(4):16-22. 被引量:191
  • 3朱建军,刘士新,王梦光.一种新的求解区间数判断矩阵权重的方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(4):29-34. 被引量:26
  • 4周礼刚,陈华友.两类区间数判断矩阵的一致性研究[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(4):47-51. 被引量:20
  • 5Satty T L. Vargas L G, Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1987,32: 107-117.
  • 6Satty T L. Inconsistency and rank preservation[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1984, (28):205-214.
  • 7Mikhailov L. A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgments[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004,159:687-704.
  • 8Wang Ying-Ming, Yang Jian-Bo, Xu Dong-Ling. A two logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval pairwise comparison judgments [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005,152: 475-498.
  • 9Byeong S. The analytic hierarchy process in. an uncertain environment, A simulation approach by Hauser and Tadikamalla(1996) [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000,124(1): 217-218.
  • 10Bryson N, Joseph A. Generaing consensus priority interval vectors for group decision making in the AHP[J]. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2000,9 (4): 127-137.

共引文献30

同被引文献81

引证文献12

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部