期刊文献+

多晶硅光伏电池板的生命周期可持续评价

A Study on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Polycrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可持续消费与生产兼顾了环境保护、经济发展与社会公平,一直是全世界共同追求的目标。生命周期评价(LCA)因侧重于环境面分析而不能满足对于复杂产品的可持续评价。通过联合国环境署(UNEP)的生命周期可持续评价理论(LCSA),探讨了产品可持续性评价的方法及应用。由于LCSA相关的评价框架尚不完整,通过文献探讨,分别制定了以清单分析和影响评估为基础的LCSA评价框架。以多晶硅光伏产品作为研究案例,经环境、经济、社会3个层面的可持续热点分析发现,硅晶片是多晶硅光伏电池板的改进重点。研究成果可作为企业管理者评价与分析产品可持续性的参考依据。 Sustainable consumption and production taking account of environment protection,economic development and social justice are always the common goals of all over the world.Life cycle assessment(LCA)is a conventional analytical method focusing,however,on environmental aspects whilst hardly fulfilling the demands for assessing sustainability of complex products.Hence,it is attempted to explore a method of product sustainability assessment and its application through UNEP's life cycle sustainability assessment(LCSA).As the LCSA is still in its infancy,the assessment framework has not yet been complete.Through literature searching,two evaluation frameworks were developed based on inventory-oriented analysis and impact-oriented assessment respectively.A product of polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic module was taken as a study case,and several sustainable hotspots were analysed in terms of environmental,economic and social aspects.It has indicated that silicon wafer would be the key that needed to be improved.The findings could be a reference to enterprise managers for evaluating and analysing the sustainability of products.
出处 《上海环境科学》 CAS 2016年第1期1-8,共8页 Shanghai Environmental Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金,编号:50906035 云南省自然科学基金,编号:2009ZC012X 昆明理工大学人才培养基金项目,编号:14118310
关键词 生命周期可持续评价 社会生命周期评价 多晶硅光伏电池板 Life cycle sustainability assessment(LCSA) Social life cycle assessment Polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic module
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1SINGH R K, MURTY H R, GUPTA S K, et al. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,9(2): 281-299.
  • 2UNEP. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication [M]. Nairobi, Kenya:United Nations EnvironmentProgramme, 2011.
  • 3UGWU O O, HAUPT T C. Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability-a South African construction industry perspective[J]. Building and Environment, 2007,42 (2) ;665-680.
  • 4WOOD R, GARNETT S. Regional sustainability in Northern Australia-A quantitative assessment of social, economic and environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 35 (6) : 1877-1882.
  • 5MICHLIK L A, LUCHT W, BONDEAU A, et al. Integrated assessment of sustainability trade-offs and pathways for global bioenergy production; Framing a novel hybrid approach[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011,15(6) ;2791- 2809.
  • 6HUANG B, YANG H, MAUERHOFER V. Sustainability assessment of low carbon technologiese case study of the building sector in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012,32 ( 1) : 244-250.
  • 7MORIIZUMI Y, MATSUI N, HONDO H. Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(16-17) : 1629-1638.
  • 8SYDOROVYCH O, WOSSINK A. The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2008,98( 1 ) : 10-20.
  • 9UNEP. Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment[M]. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, 2011.
  • 10KLOPFFER W. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2008,13(2) : 89-95.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部