期刊文献+

用项目反应理论编制中文版远程联想测验(RAT) 被引量:3

Constructing Chinese Remote Associates Test(RAT) with Application of Item Response Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 遵循远程联想理论,筛选适用于中国中学生群体的远程联想测验题本;运用项目反应理论,构建双参数模型,使用来自广东、甘肃和湖北3所中学2659名初中学生的结果进行项目分析检验。遵照标准参照测验的编制原则,选取难度为?3.00~3.00,区分度为0.30~2.50以及θ(π0)处信息量大于0.20的项目,编制了中文版远程联想测验(RAT)(计91个项目)。该中文版RAT与托伦斯创造力测验、伦科创造力测验和瑞文智力测验的成绩正相关,该测验可以预测中学生的学业成绩和教师评价的创造力表现。此外,还讨论了该测验在实践中的应用价值。 The aim of the current study is to construct the Remote Associates Test(RAT) in Chinese version, which is based on the theory of associative creativity. Item response theory(IRT) with Binary Logistic Models was used for item selection. Participants were 2659 middle-school students from Guangdong, Gansu, and Hubei Province. Based on the principle of Criterion-Referenced Test, the item difficulty was limited between ?3.00 and 3.00, the item discrimination was limited between 0.30 and 2.50, and the item information was above 0.20. In addition, the RAT scores were positively correlated with scores on the Torrance Test of Creativity, Runco Test, and Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Results of RAT were also positively correlated with teachers' evaluations of creativity and could significantly predict middle-school academic performance. Potential applications of RAT are also discussed.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期354-362,共9页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 国家自然科学基金(31200792 91224008 91324201)资助
关键词 创造力 远程联想测验 项目反应理论 信息函数 学业成绩 creativity Remote Associates Test item response theory information function academic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Yao X, Yang Q, Dong N, et al. The moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 13 (1): 53-57.
  • 2施建农,陈宁,杜翔云,张兴利,张真,段小菊,刘彤冉.创造力心理学与杰出人才培养[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(S1):164-173. 被引量:9
  • 3Dietrich A, Kanso R. A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 2010, 136(5): 822-848.
  • 4Kim K H. Can we trust creativity tests? a review of the torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 2006, 18(1): 3-14.
  • 5张景焕,张广斌.中学生创造性思维发展特点研究[J].当代教育科学,2004(5):52-54. 被引量:9
  • 6Horn D, Salvendy G. Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: a review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2006, 16(2): 155-175.
  • 7宋晓辉,施建农.创造力测量手段——同感评估技术(CAT)简介[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):739-744. 被引量:34
  • 8Han K. Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: how quantitative and qualitative data support it. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2003, 37(2): 117-142.
  • 9曲小军,施建农.评价和奖赏对场依存、场独立儿童语言创造力的影响[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(6):408-412. 被引量:8
  • 10Kaufman J C, Plucker J A, Russell C M. Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012, 30(1): 60-73.

二级参考文献173

共引文献125

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部