期刊文献+

联合化疗方案剂量强度对弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响 被引量:2

Effects of dose intensity of chemotherapeutic regimen on prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨联合化疗方案剂量强度对弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者预后的影响。方法初诊DLBCL患者64例,经化疗方案联合或不联合利妥昔单抗治疗,回顾性分析患者的年龄、国际预后指数(IPI)、化疗方案药物的平均相对剂量强度(ARDI)等因素对患者完全缓解(CR)率和1年生存率的影响。结果患者年龄〉60岁、IPI评分3~5分患者的CR率和1年生存率均低于年龄≤60岁、IPI评分0~2分者(P〈0.05)。患者化疗方案药物的ARDI≤90%的1年生存率亦低于ARDI〉90%者(P〈0.05)。年龄和化疗方案药物的ARDI是DLBCL患者疗效和预后的独立影响因素(P〈0.05)。结论对于初诊的DLBCL患者,治疗过程中化疗方案药物的ARDI可影响患者预后。 Objective To investigate the effects of dose intensity of chemotherapeutic regimen on the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL).Methods A total of 64 patients newly diagnosed as DLBCL underwent the treatment of chemotherapy regimens with or without rituximab was retrospectively analyzed.The effects of age,international prognostic index(IPI)and average relative dose intensity(ARDI)of chemotherapy regimen on complete remission(CR)rate and one-year survival rate were evaluated.Results The CR and one-year survival rates were lower in the patients aged 60years old or IPI 3-5 points than those aged ≤60 years old or IPI 0-2 points(P〈0.05).The one-year survival rate was lower in the patients with ARDI≤90% than those with ARDI90%(P〈0.05).The age and ARDI were the independent risk factors for CR and one-year survival rates in the patients with DLBCL(P〈0.05).Conclusion The ARDI of chemotherapy regimen can affect the prognosis of the patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第6期639-641,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(81202358)
关键词 弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤 化疗 平均相对剂量强度 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Chemotherapy Average relative dose intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Menon MP,Pittaluga S,Jaffe ES.The histological and biological spectrum of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the World Health Organization classification[J].Cancer J,2012,18(5):411-420.
  • 2Habermann TM,Weller EA,Morrison VA,et al.RituximabCHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J].J Clin Oncol,2006,24(19):3121-3127.
  • 3Zhou Z,Sehn LH,Rademaker AW,et al.An enhanced International Prognostic Index(NCCN-IPI)for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era[J].Blood,2014,123(6):837-842.
  • 4Chau I,Webb A,Cunningham D,et al.An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J].Br J Haematol,2001,115(4):786-792.
  • 5Khaled HM,Zekri ZK,Mokhtar N,et al.A randomized EPOCH vs.CHOP front-line therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients:long-term results[J].Ann Oncol,1999,10(12):1489-1492.
  • 6Fernandez HF,Sun Z,Yao X,et al.Anthracycline dose intensification in acute myeloid leukemia[J].N Engl J Med,2009,361(13):1249-1259.
  • 7Yamaguchi H,Hirakawa T,Inokuchi K.Importance of relative dose intensity in chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J].J Clin Exp Hematop,2011,51(1):1-5.
  • 8Pfreundschuh M,Trümper L,Kloess M,et al.Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas:results of the NHL-B2trial of the DSHNHL[J].Blood,2004,104(3):634-641.
  • 9陈施婧,朱彦,雷芳,吴玉姣,汤郁,王丽霞,余先球,费小明.(R)-CHOP方案中阿霉素平均每周剂量强度影响初诊弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的治疗效果[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(4):529-533. 被引量:6
  • 10Fisher RI,Gaynor ER,Dahlberg S,et al.Comparison of a standard regimen(CHOP)with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J].N Engl J Med,1993,328(14):1002-1006.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly pa- tients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphomaZoom[J]. N En- gl J Med, 2002,346 (4) : 235-242.
  • 2Habermann TM,Weller EA,Morrison VA,et al. Ritux-imab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rit- uximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lym- phoma [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24 (19) : 3121-3127.
  • 3Vaidya R,Witzig TE. Prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the R(X)CHOP era[J]. Ann Oncol, 2014,25 (11) : 2124-2133.
  • 4Wilder RB,Rodriguez MA, Medeiros LJ, et al. Interna- tional prognostic index-based outcomes for diffuse large B -cell lymphomas [ J ]. Cancer, 2002,94 (12) : 3083 -3088.
  • 5McKelvey EM,Gottlieb JA,Wilson HE,et al. Hydroxyl- daunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma[J]. Cancer, 1976,38(4) : 1484-1493.
  • 6Fisher RI,Gaynor ER,Dahlberg S,et al. A phase 111 com- parison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non- Hodgkin's lymphoma:results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067),the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study [J]. Ann Oncol, 1994,5(Suppl 2) :91-95.
  • 7Abdelhamid T,Samra M,Ramadan H,et al. Clinical prog- nostic factors of diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin lym- phoma:a retrospective study[J]. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, 2011,23(1):17-24.
  • 8Rajkumar SV,Jacobus S,Callander NS,et al. Eastern Co- operative Oncology Group. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexam- ethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed muhiple myeloma:an open-label randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010,11 ( 1 ) : 29-37.
  • 9Pfreundschuh M,Zeynalova S, Poeschel V, et al. Improved outcome of elderly patients with poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after dose-dense ritux- imab:Results of the DENSE-R-CHOP-14 trial of the Ger- man High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) [J]. J Clin Oncol,2008,26(15S):8508.
  • 10Rajkumar SV,Jacobus S,Callander NS,et al. Eastern Co- operative Oncology Group. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexam- ethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed muhiple myeloma:an open-label randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010,11 ( 1 ) : 29-37 Pfreundschuh M,Zeynalova S,Poeschel V,et al. Improved outcome of elderly patients with poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after dose-dense ritux- imab:Results of the DENSE-R-CHOP-14 trial of the Ger- man High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(15S) :8508.

共引文献5

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部