摘要
文章以h指数、学术迹、影响矩等文献计量指标作为学术化评价指标,用补充计量指标(Altmetric indicators)作为社会化评价指标,对应用物理学、环境科学、经济学、历史学四个学科的各60篇单篇论著的评价效果进行综合比较研究。结果表明各评价指标均具有独立意义。在揭示h指数、学术迹、影响矩等学术化评价指标之间存在显著相关性的同时,发现社会化评价指标与学术化评价指标之间没有显著相关性,不可能用补充计量指标替代学术评价指标。
Applying h-index, academic trace and impact torque as academic indicators, Altmetric score as social indica-tors, comparative studies were done with 240 articles, 60 from each of the four fields of physics applied, environmental sciences, economics, and history. The results show that each indicator has its independent meaning. There are obvious correlations among h-index, academic trace and impact torque, but no obvious correlation between academic indicators and altmetric indicators is found, so it is impossible to substitute academic indicators by altmetric indicators.
出处
《图书与情报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期85-94,共10页
Library & Information
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"专利h指数与专利信息网络测度研究"(项目编号:71173187)
江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室建设资金资助项目研究成果之一
关键词
H指数
学术迹
影响矩
学术评价
学术指标
补充计量指标
h-index
academic trace
impact torque
academic assessment
academic indicator
altmetric indicator
