期刊文献+

基于评论者关系的垃圾评论者识别研究 被引量:3

Research on Review Spammer Detection via Reviewer Relationship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 垃圾评论者在很大程度上误导潜在消费者和观点挖掘系统。目前检测垃圾评论者的方法主要是基于评论、评论者和商店之间的关系,忽略了评论者之间的关系。针对上述问题,提出了基于评论者多边图的产品垃圾评论者检测方法。首先,以每个评论者为节点,评论者之间的关系为边,构建评论者之间的关系图模型;其次,根据多边图模型,提出了一种基于PageRank的评论者互评估可信度模型来检测垃圾评论者;最后,采用卓越亚马逊和Resellerrating.com平台上的数据进行验证。结果表明:该模型能够更有效地识别出垃圾评论者,在一定程度上解决了难识别仅发表一条评论的评论者的可信度问题。 The review spammer greatly misleads the consumers and opinion mining system. Presently, the research of review spammer detection mainly is based on relationships among reviewers, reviews and stores, which doesn't take the relationships among reviewers into consideration. This paper proposes a multi- edge graph model to identify review spammer. Firstly, in the multi-edge graph model, the nodes represent reviewers and the edges represent the relationships among reviewers. Secondly, according to multi-edge graph model, reviewers' inter-assess trustiness model is based on PageRank algorithm to identify review spammer. And lastly, the datasets are crawled from JOYO Amazon website and Resellerrating. com. Experimental re- sults show that the model can achieve better performance on the accuracy of review spammer detection and the identification of review spammer who had only one review can be solved in some extent.
出处 《集美大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2016年第2期146-152,共7页 Journal of Jimei University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(61300105) 教育部博士点基金联合资助项目(2012351410010) 福建省科技重大专项(2013H6012) 福州市科技计划资助项目(2012-G-113 2013-PT-45)
关键词 互评估 可信度 多边图模型 评论关系 垃圾评论者 inter-assess trustiness multi-edge graph model review relationship review spammer
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1JINDAL N, LIU B, LIME P. Finding unusual review patterns using unexpected rules//Proceedings of the 19th ACM In- ternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM, 2010: 1549- 1552. DOI: 10. 1145/1871437. 1871669.
  • 2FEI G, MUKHERJEE A, LIU B, et al. Exploiting burstiness in reviews for review spammer detection. ICWSM, 2013, 13 : 175-184.
  • 3LIME P, NGUYEN V A, JINDAL N, et al. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors//Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, USA: ACM, 2010: 939-948. DOI: 10. 1145/1871437. 1871557.
  • 4LIANG D, LIU X, SHEN H. Detecting spam reviewers by combing reviewer feature and relationship//Informative and Cybernetics for Computational Social Systems ( ICCSS), 2014 International Conference on IEEE, 2014 : 102-107. DOI : 10. 1109/ICCSS. 2014. 6961824.
  • 5WANG G, XIE S, LIU B, et al. Identify online store review spammers via social review graph. Transactions on Intelli- gent Systems and Technology (TIST), ACM, 2012, 3(4) : 61 : 1-21. DOI: 10. 1145/2337542. 2337546.
  • 6JINDAL N, LIU B. Review Spare Detection//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. Ban- ff, Alber-ta, Canada: ACM, 2007: 1189-1190. DOI: 10. 1145/1242572. 1242759.
  • 7JINDAL N, LIU B. Analyzing and Detecting Review Spam//Proceeding of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM07). Omaha, Nebrask, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007: 547-552. DOI: 10. ll09/ICDM. 2007. 68.
  • 8JINDAL N, LIU B. Opinion spam and analysis//Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining. PaloAlto, California, USA: ACM, 2008: 219-230. DOI: 10. 1145/13415311341560.
  • 9MUKHERJEE A, LIU B, WANG J, et al. Detecting Group Review Spam//Proceedings of the 20th International Confer- ence Companion on World Wide Web. Hyderabad, India: ACM, 2011: 93-94. DOI: 10. 1145/1963192. 1963240.
  • 10MUKHERJEE A, LIU B, GLANCE N. Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews//International World Wide Web Conference Committee. Lyon, France: ACM, 2012: 191-200. DOI: 10. 1145/2187836. 2187863.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Becchetti L, Castillo C. Donato D, et al. Link Analysis for Web Spam Detection[EB/OL]. (2010-11-21). http://www.chato.cl/ papers/becchetti_2007 link analysis web_spam_detection.pdf.
  • 2Chirita P A, Diederich J, Nejdl W. MailRank: Using Ranking for Spam Detection[C]//Proc. of the 14th ACM International Con- ference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2005.
  • 3Benevenuto F, Magno G, Rodrigues T, et al. Detecting Spammers on Twitter[C]//Proc. of Anti-abuse and Spam Conference on Collaboration, Electronic Messaging. [S. 1.]: IEEE Press, 2010.
  • 4Gilbert E, Karahalios K. Understanding Deja Reviewers[C]//Proc. of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2010.
  • 5Dellarocas C. Immunizing Online Reputation Reporting Systems Against Unfair Ratings and Discriminatory Behavior[C]//Proc. of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2000.
  • 6Wu Guangyu, Greene D, Smyth B, et al. Distortion As a Validation Criterion in the Identification of Suspicious Reviews[EB/OL]. (2010-11-21). http://www.csi.ucd.ie/content/distortion-validation- criterion-identification-suspicious-reviews.
  • 7Mizil C D N, Kossinets G, Kleinberg J, et al. How Opinions are Received by Online Communities: A Case Study on Amazon.corn Helpfulness Votes[C]//Proc. of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2009.
  • 8Lim E P, Nguyen V A, Jindal N, et al. Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Rating Behaviors[C]//Proc. of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2010.
  • 9JAarvelin K, KekAalAainen J. 1R Evaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents[C]//Proc. of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York, USA: [s. n.], 2000.
  • 10Bos W, Tarnai C. Content Analysis in Empirical Social Research[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1999, 31(8): 659- 671.

共引文献15

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部