3Harrington C A, Brissette J C, Carlson W C. Root sys- tem structure in planted and seeded loblolly and shortleaf pine[J]. Forest Science, 1989, 35(2) : 469-480.
4Jeanne A R, Lindgren B S. Relationships between root form and growth, stability, and mortality in planted ver- sus naturally regenerated lodgepole pine in north-central British Columbia [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Forest Re- search, 2006, 36(10): 2642-2653.
5Lindstrfim A, Rune G. Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness [ J]. Plant and Soil, 1999, 217:29-37.
6LoGullo M A, Salleo S. Different strategies of drought re- sistance in three mediterranean sclerophyllous trees grow- ing in the same environment conditions[ J]. New Phytolo- gy, 1988, 108 : 267-276.
7Mohd R I, Khuzaimah M N. Growth, water relations and physiological processes of starfruit (Averrhoa carambola L) plants under root growth restriction[ J]. Scientia Hor- ticulturae, 1996, 66:51-58.
8Villar-Salvadora P, Planellesb R, Enrtquez E, et al. Nursery cultivation regimes, plant functional attributes, and field performance relationships in the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex L[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 196:257-266.
9Pinto J R, Dumroese R K, Davis A S, et al. Conducting seedling stocktype trials: A new approach to an old ques- tion[J]. Journal of Forestry, 2011 , 109(5) : 293-299.
10Day D C, Parker W C. Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak ( Quercus rubra L. ) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelter- wood[J]. New Forest, 1997, 14:145-156.
