基于生态标签制度的海洋生态产品生态补偿标准区域差异化研究被引量：20

Study on the Regional Difference of Eco-compensation Standards for the Marine Ecological Products Based on Marine Fisheries' Eco-Label Schemes

原文传递

导出

摘要论文运用海洋渔业产品生态标签制度,以两个海岛型旅游目的地为案例,对海洋生态产品生态补偿标准区域差异化进行了研究。结果表明:1)浙江省舟山市普陀区和山东省烟台市长岛县分别有93.41%和95.90%的受访者支持海洋渔业生态标签产品,愿意为海洋渔业生态标签产品支付比普通海产品更高的价格;2)舟山市普陀区旅游目的地的浙江省游客、江苏省-上海市游客、安徽省-江西省-福建省-河南省-湖南省-湖北省-山东省游客和其他省(市、区)游客,承担的生态补偿标准分别为10.53、10.98、11.03和11.18元/kg,或14.39、17.59、20.54和22.87元/人次,通过海洋渔业产品生态标签制度,2013年可获得1.035 8×108元的生态补偿资金;3)烟台市长岛县旅游目的地的山东省游客、北京市-天津市-河北省-山西省-河南省游客和其他省(市、区)游客,承担的生态补偿标准分别为10.86、12.85和13.70元/kg,或13.26、17.57和17.56元/人次,通过海洋渔业产品生态标签制度,2013年可获得0.207 0×108元的生态补偿资金。研究发现,两个旅游目的地均存在生态补偿标准的区域差异性。 Marine fisheries eco- label schemes are used to research the regional difference of ecological compensation standards（ECSs） for the marine fisheries eco-label products（MFEPs）using two island tourist destinations as typical cases. The results indicated that： 1） 93.41% of respondents in Putuo District of Zhoushan City would like to pay for the MFEPs, and it is95.90% in Changdao County of Yantai City. Moreover, the respondents in the two destinations would be willing to pay higher prices for the MFEPs than for the ordinary seafood products. 2）In Zhoushan destination, the ECSs undertaken by tourists from Zhejiang Province, Jiangsu Province and Shanghai City, Anhui- Jiangxi- Fujian- Henan- Hunan- Hubei- Shandong provinces, and the other provinces are 10.53, 10.98, 11.03 and 11.18 yuan per kilogram, or 14.39,17.59, 20.54 and 22.87 yuan per person, respectively. The ecological compensation funds were1.035 8×108yuan in 2013 by marine fisheries eco-label schemes. 3） In Changdao destination,the ECSs undertaken by tourists from Shandong Province, Beijing- Tianjin- Hebei- ShanxiHenan provinces, and the other provinces are 10.86, 12.85 and 13.70 per kilogram, or 13.26,17.57 and 17.56 yuan per person. The ecological compensation funds were 0.207 0×108yuan in 2013 by marine fisheries eco-label schemes. The study found that the regional difference of ECSs exist in two destinations.

作者肖建红王敏刘娟张然

机构地区青岛大学商学院

出处《自然资源学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期402-412,共11页 Journal of Natural Resources

基金国家自然科学基金项目(41301622) 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2013GQ005) 山东省社会科学规划项目(13DJJJ03) 山东省高等学校社会科学研究项目(J12WG03)~~

关键词海洋生态产品海洋渔业产品生态标签制度生态补偿标准区域差异化舟山市普陀区烟台市长岛县 marine ecological products marine fisheries eco-label schemes ecological compensation standard regional difference Putuo District of Zhoushan City Changdao County of Yantai City

分类号 F592.7 [经济管理—旅游管理] X321 [环境科学与工程—环境工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1任耀武,袁国宝.初论“生态产品”[J].生态学杂志,1992,11(6):48-50. 被引量：55
2蔡培印. 生态产品拾零[J]. 环境, 1996(1): 23-24.
3Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
4RECZKOVA L, SULAIMAN J, BAHARI Z. Some issues of consumer preferences for eco-labeled fish to promote sustainable marine capture fisheries in peninsular Malaysia[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 91: 497-504.
5BRECARD D, HLAIMI B, LUCAS S, et al. Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 69(1): 115-125.
6FAO. The state of world marine fishery resources[R]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2009.
7XU P, ZENG Y C, FONG Q, et al. Chinese consumers' willingness to pay for green- and eco-labeled seafood[J]. Food Control, 2012, 28(1): 74-82.
8THRANE M, ZIEGLER F, SONESSON U. Eco-labelling of wild-caught seafood products[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(3): 416-423.
9CHANG H H. Does the use of eco-labels affect income distribution and income inequality of aquaculture producers in Taiwan?[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 80: 101-108.
10WESSELS C, JOHNSTON R, DONATH H. Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: The influence of species, certifier, and household attributes[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 81(5): 1084-1089.