期刊文献+

75岁以上老年多发性骨髓瘤85例临床特点和疗效分析

Clinical characteristics and analysis of multiple myeloma in patients over 75 years old
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析75岁以上老年多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的临床特点和疗效。方法对北京大学人民医院1996年8月至2015年4月所有75岁以上MM患者85例临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 85例老年MM患者平均年龄为(78.5±3.78)岁,DS分期Ⅲ期52例、R-ISS分期Ⅲ期5例。接受治疗的70例患者中,治疗方案中含硼替佐米29例,不含硼替佐米41例。含硼替佐米与不含硼替佐米的治疗相比,对75岁以上老年患者治疗有效率、无进展生存(PFS)期、总生存(OS)期差异均无统计学意义。结论 75岁以上老年MM患者为虚弱状态,虚弱比例达87%,含硼替佐米方案无明显有效率、PFS及OS获益。 Objective This study aimed to analysis clinical features and efficacy of multiple myeloma in patients over 75 years old. Methods we retrospectively analyzed 85 cases of multiple myeloma over 75 years old,who were diagnosed from August 1996 to April 2015 in Peking University People's hospital. Results the mean age was (78.5±3.78)years, and the median age was 77 years. There were 52 cases in DS stage III, and 5 cases in R-ISS stage III. 70 cases received treatment, among them, 29 cases received bortezomib containing regimens, 41 cases received regimens without bortezomib. In multiple myeloma patients of over 75 years old, there was no significant difference in treatment efficacy, progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion patients over 75 years old with multiple myeloma were frailty, frail patients were 87%, there were no benefit of efficacy3 PFS and OS on bortezomib-containing regimens.
出处 《中国实用内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期315-317,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
基金 科技部重大专项(2012ZX09303019)
关键词 老年 多发性骨髓瘤 虚弱状态 硼替佐米 elderly patient multiple myeloma frail bortezomib
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Lu J, Lu J, Chen W, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcome in newly diagnosed chinese patients with multiple myeloma: Results of a multicenter analysis [J]. Blood Cancer J, 2014, 4: e239.
  • 2Pozzi S, Marcheselli L, Bari A, et al. Survival of multiple myeloma patients in the era of novel therapies confirms the improvement in patients younger than 75 years: A population-based analysis [J]. British journal ofhaematology, 2013, 163(1): 40-46.
  • 3Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Dickman PW, et al. Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: A population-based study of patients diagnosed in sweden from 1973 to 2003 [J].J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(15): 1993- 1999.
  • 4Turesson I, Velez R, Kristinsson SY, et al. Patterns of improved survival in patients with multiple myetoma in the twenty-first century: A population-based study[j].j Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(5): 830-834.
  • 5林洁,朱宏丽.80岁以上高龄老年多发性骨髓瘤11例临床分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2014,41(13):849-852. 被引量:6
  • 6中国多发性骨髓瘤诊治指南(2013年修订)[J].中华内科杂志,2013,52(9):791-795. 被引量:146
  • 7Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: A report from international myeloma working group [J].J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(26): 2863-2869.
  • 8Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: An international myeloma working group report[J]. Blood, 201S, 125(13): 2068-2074.
  • 9Niesvizky R, Flinn IW, Rift, in R, et al. Community-based phase iiib trial of three upfront bortezomib-based myeloma regimens[J]. J Clin Oncolj 2015, 33(33): 3921-3929.
  • 10马泳泳,周淑娟,陈枫煜,蔡芳芳,俞康.地西他滨联合丙戊酸钠诱导的骨髓瘤细胞凋亡及其机制研究[J].解放军医学杂志,2013,38(10):837-841. 被引量:6

二级参考文献15

  • 1Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma[K]. N EnglJ Med, 2011, 364(11):1046-1060.
  • 2The International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classi- fication of monoclonal gamrnopathies, multiple myeloma and relat- ed disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group[K]. BrJ Haematol, 2003, 121(5):749-757.
  • 3Kristinsson SY, Anderson WF, Landgren O. Improvel long-term survival in multiple myeloma up to the age of 80 years[K]. Leukemia, 2014, 28(6):1346-1348.
  • 4Ludwig H, Bolejack V, Crowley J, et al. Survival and yem's of life lost in different age cohorts of patients with multiple myeloma[J], j Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9):1599-1605.
  • 5Nilsson T, Lenhoff S, Turesson I, et al. Cytogenetic features of mul- tiple myeloma: Impact of gender, age, disease phase, culture time, and cytokine stimulation[J]. EurJ Haematol, 2002, 68(6):345-353.
  • 6Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, et al. Phase W clinical u'ial of tha- lidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group[J]. J Clin Oncol,2006, 24(3):431-436.
  • 7Gay F, Larocca A, Wijermans P, et al. Complete responsecorrelates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderlymy- eloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients[J]. Blood, 2011, 117(11):3025-3031.
  • 8Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials[K]. Blood, 2011, 118(5):1239-1247.
  • 9Ocio EM, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, et al. New drugs and nov- el mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma in 2013: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) [J]. Leu- kemia, 2014, 28(3):525-542.
  • 10Yaqub S, Ballester G, Ballester O. Frontline therapy for multiple my- eloma: a concise review of the evidence based on randomized clini- cal trials[J]. Cancer Invest, 2013, 31 (8):529-537.

共引文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部