期刊文献+

车辆借用责任保险合同纠纷中的合同相对性问题

Analysis of the Privity of Contract in the Contract Dispute about the Liability Insurance Caused by the Vehicle Loan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合同相对性是合同制度的基石。在车辆借用引发的责任保险合同纠纷中,对于投保人和保险人之间的仲裁协议应坚持合同的相对性,其效力不能延及于车辆借用人,而保险车辆借用人尽管不是投保人,但是有资格突破合同相对性而成为原告。 The privity of contract is conerstone of the contract system. The arbitral agreement between the applicant and the insurer should abide the privity of contract in the contract dispute about the liability insurance caused by the vehicle loan,the effect can't be extended to the vehicular borrower. The vehicular borrower is not the applicant,but he's qualified to become the plaintiff after making a breakthrough of the privity of contract.
作者 周晓 匡青松
机构地区 中南大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期54-58,共5页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 车辆借用 责任保险合同 合同相对性 赔偿 vehicle loan liability insurance contract the privity of contract compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1王利明.论合同的相对性[J].中国法学,1996(4):63-73. 被引量:146
  • 2桂裕.《保险法学论》,中国台湾地区三民书局1981年版,第1页.
  • 3艾伦·雷德芬,马丁·亨特等.《国际商事仲裁法律与实践》,林一飞,宋连斌译,北京大学出版社2005年版,第161-162页.
  • 4Interbras Cayman Co. v. Orient Victory Shipping Co. , 663 F. 2d 4 (2d Cir. 1981 ).
  • 5Michael H. Bagot, Jr, Dana A. Henderson, Not Party, Not Bound? Not Necessarily: Binding Third Parties to Maritime Arbitration ,Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Summer 2002, pp439- 448.
  • 6Michael H. Bagot, Jr, Dana A. Henderson, Not Party, Not Bound? Not Necessarily: Binding Third Parties to Maritime Arbitration ,Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Summer 2002, pp450-456.
  • 7Charles Lee Eisen, What Arbitration Agreement? Compelling Non - Signatories to Arbitrate, Dispute Resolution Journal, July, 2001, pp44 -45.
  • 8Gvozdenovie v. United Air Lines, Inc. , 933 F. 2d 1100 (2d Cir. 1991).
  • 9李宣琛.《日耳曼法概说》,商务印书馆1944年版,第72页.
  • 10约翰·史密斯爵士.《合同法(第四版)》,张昕译,法律出版社2004年版,第87-88页.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部