期刊文献+

行政权理论变迁视域下环评审批司法审查之重构 被引量:4

Reconstruction of Judicial Review on Eia Approval in the Perspective of Theory Change of Executive Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在传送带模式及专家模式理论下,行政权正当性来源于立法明确授权及行政机关本身拥有的人才与专业资源,使得法院主要审查环评审批是否符合法律规定,且在赋予行政自由裁量权的高度专业性质事务上采取自制的态度而尊重行政机关的决定。面对高度专业性的环评审批,立法授权无法遏止,科技理性招致质疑,唯有确保利益相关者的程序参与权,方可赋予行政决定实质正当性。面对行政权正当性理论的变化,法院亦应对环评审批司法审查原告资格的赋予及审查标准进行反思,恰当回应行政权从参与模式对程序理性及公民参与的追求来证成司法审查的正当性,同时实现对环评审批权的司法监督。 Under the convey belt model and expert mode theory,executive legitimacy is from legislation mandate and the administrative authority itself having talent and professional resources,making the court mainly review the eia approval in accordance with the law,and in giving highly specialized nature of the administrative discretion affairs homemade attitude and respect the decision of the administrative organ. In the face of eia approval which is highly professional,legislation authorization cannot be contained,science rational is also questioned by people,only to ensure stakeholders' program participation,can give administrative decision substantive legitimacy. Due to the change of executive legitimacy theory,the court also should deal with the plaintiff qualification of judicial review and review standards on eia approval,and make appropriate response to the executive power from procedural rationality and citizen participation to pursuit the legitimacy of judicial review,at the same time,it will realize the judicial supervision on eia approval.
作者 阮丽娟
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期64-67,共4页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"环境影响评价的司法审查研究"(13XFX010) 国家社会科学基金项目"应对气候变化资金机制的国际法问题及其新动向研究"(14XFX015)
关键词 环评审批 司法审查 传送带模式 专业模式 参与模式 the eia approval judicial review convey belt pattern professional mode participation mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[美]理查德.B.斯图尔特.美国行政法的重构[M].沈岿译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
  • 2R. v. Secretary of State for the Hope Department, ex part Fire Bri-gades Union[ 1995] 2 AC 513.
  • 3Sir John Laws: " Law and Democracy",Public Law, 1995.
  • 4任定成.科学人文读本(大学卷)[j].北京:北京大学出版社’2004.
  • 5杜文苓.环评制度中的专家会议[J].台湾民主季刊,2012(3):126,125.
  • 6简凯伦.论风险社会下的环评制度与法院--司法系统与社会脉络的相互建构[D]. “国立”台湾大学社会科学院国家发展研究所’2011.
  • 7张英磊.多元移植与民主转型过程中”我国”环评司法审查之发展[D].“国立”台湾大学法律学院法律学研究所,2009.
  • 8李建良.环境议题的形成与国家任务的变迁[A].宪法体制与法治行政[C].台湾:三民书局,1998.
  • 9玛莎.S.本森.环境案件起诉资格、公民诉讼和环境清理责任分摊[A].吕忠梅、王立德.环境公益诉讼--中美之比较[C|.法律出版社,2009.
  • 10余凌云.法院如何发展行政法[J].中国社会科学,2008(1):87-99. 被引量:52

二级参考文献38

  • 1江必新.司法解释对行政法学理论的发展[J].中国法学,2001(4):36-48. 被引量:66
  • 2曹士兵.最高人民法院裁判、司法解释的法律地位[J].中国法学,2006(3):175-181. 被引量:104
  • 3王名扬.《法国行政法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1979年版.21,101页.
  • 4王名扬.《英国行政法》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1989年版.第204页.
  • 5Anthony Lester, "English Judges as Law Makers, "p. 278.
  • 6H. W. R. Wade & C. F. Forsyth, Administrative Law, pp. 17-18.
  • 7Lord Justice Woolf, "The Role of the English Judiciary in Developing Public Law, "pp. 669- 677.
  • 8Richard Wilberforce, "Lord Diplock and Administrative Law, "pp. 6-7.
  • 9Michael Supperstone QC & James Goudie QC, Judicial Review, pp. 6,8.
  • 10Richard Wilberforce, "Lord Diplock and Administrative Law, "p. 7.

共引文献54

同被引文献43

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部