哈佛大学与首都医科大学康复医学系脊髓损伤康复专业医师教育培训体系比较研究

Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Physician Training System: Comparation of Harvard University and Capital Medical University

目的比较哈佛大学与首都医科大学在脊髓损伤专业医师培养方面的不同。方法调查哈佛大学康复医学系脊髓损伤康复专业医师培养体系和首都医科大学康复医学系脊髓损伤康复专业医师培养体系情况,包括脊髓损伤专业医师学历教育年限、专科医师培养年限、培养费用情况、康复教育机构设置情况等。结果脊髓损伤康复专业医师接受大学基础教育时间哈佛大学高于首都医科大学,专科培训哈佛大学和首都医科大学总年限分别为7年和5年,但专科和亚专科时间比例无明显差异。在培训机构组成方面,哈佛大学系统有26家脊髓损伤社区康复门诊,而首都医科大学系统无专门的脊髓损伤社区康复门诊。结论可借鉴哈佛大学脊髓损伤康复专业医师培养体系,提高首都医科大学脊髓损伤康复专业建设。

Objective To compare the difference of the spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician training systems between Harvard University and Capital Medical University. Methods The spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician training systems of Capital Medical University and Harvard University were investigated, including the degree training time, residence training time, training fee and institution. Results Degree education time was more in the basic science in Harvard University than in Capital Medical University. The residence training time was 7 years and 5 years for Harvard University and Capital Medical University, respectively, and the ratio of specialties and sub- specialties was not significantly different. There was a total of 26 spinal cord injury community rehabilitation clinics in Harvard University system, and none in Capital Medical University. Conclusion Some light can be drawn from the spinal cord injury rehabilitation physician training system of Harvard University, to improve the scholastic building of Capital Medical University.