期刊文献+

比较法视野下电商平台侵权责任探析 被引量:3

Research on E-commerce platform's infringement liability under a comparative law perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电商平台的法律责任是电子商务活动以及电子商务立法中的核心问题。电子商务平台在交易活动中是否应当承担责任以及如何界定电商平台的法律责任,目前学界在法理上并未达成统一的意见。试图从比较法的角度出发,首先分析电商平台的法律地位和网络交易中电商平台侵权责任的类型,然后进一步分析电商平台承担侵权责任的基础——义务,最终得出结论:电商平台应该履行合理的注意义务;需要同时考虑平台的能力,而电商平台是否应承担监控义务仍有待商榷。 The liability of E-commerce platform is the most important issue in E-commerce legislation as well as in online disputes settlement. Whether the E-commerce platform should be responsible for the infringement which happened on its platform and which kind of liability should Platform take are still argued by Internet companies, authorities and scholars.Firstly, this article tries to analyze the legal status of E-commerce platform and the infringement liabilities it may take.Secondly, it tries to find out the obligations that E-commerce platform may have for establishing the basement of infringement liability. Thirdly it comes to the conclusion that the E-commerce platform should fulfil the duty of care while the duty of monitor should be more deliberative.
作者 何波
出处 《现代电信科技》 2016年第1期49-54,共6页 Modern Science & Technology of Telecommunications
关键词 电商平台 助侵权责任 引诱侵权责任 代理侵权责任 侵权责任 E-commerce Platform Contributory Liability Inducement Liability Vicarious Liability infringement liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献49

  • 1王迁.“索尼案”二十年祭——回顾、反思与启示[J].科技与法律,2004(4):59-68. 被引量:57
  • 2刘家瑞.NAPSTER案与文件共享技术的版权责任[J].科技与法律,2004(4):69-77. 被引量:14
  • 3《CNNIC发布<第26次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告>》,http://www.cnnic.net.cn/html/Dir/2010/07/15/5921.htm.2010年10月6日访问.
  • 4Tribunaux de grande instance [ T. G. I. ] [ ordinary courts of original jurisdiction] Troyes, June 4, 2008, 14 ( Fr. ).
  • 5Doreen Carvajal, eBay Ordered to Pay $ 61 Million in Sale of Counterfeit Goods, N.Y. Times, July 1, 2008, at 3.
  • 6Pierre - Antoine Souehard, France Faults eBay over Fake Goods, Wash. Post, July 1, 2008, at D08.
  • 7Tribunal de commerce [T.C. ][commercial court] Brussels, July 31, 2008, No.A/07/06032, 1 - 3(Belg. ).
  • 8Eric Auehard, eBay Dealt Blow on Fake Rolexes by Gen-nan Gain, Reuters, July 27, 2007.
  • 9Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 576 F. Supp. 2d 463,472 (S.D.N.Y.2008).
  • 10Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc. (2nd Cir. Apr. 1, 2010).

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部