期刊文献+

科学表征语用学两种进路探析

Two Pragmatic Approaches to Scientific Representation
原文传递
导出
摘要 巴斯·范·弗拉森和罗纳德·吉尔是当代著名的两位科学哲学家。两人都将科学理论理解为由作为非语言实体的模型集合所构成,都在表征问题上突出科学主体的作用并因而选择了语用学进路。然而,分析表明,他们在模型本体论、科学表征以及对待科学实在论的态度等诸多方面存在根本差别。 Both Bas Van Fraassen and Ronald N. Giere are famous contemporary philosophers of science. Both hold that a scientific theory consists of a collection of models as non-linguistic entities,and take the pragmatic approach which emphasizes the role of scientific agents. However,analysis shows that there are fundamental differences between their accounts of the ontology of scientific models and of scientific representation,and their attitudes towards scientific realism.
作者 李元明
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期6-11,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家重大社科基金项目"认知科学对当代哲学的挑战"(11&ZD187) 国家重大社科基金项目"科学实践哲学与地方性知识研究"(13&DZ068)
关键词 巴斯·范·弗拉森 罗纳德·吉尔 模型本体论 科学表征 语用学进路 Bas van Fraassen Ronald N.Giere ontology of models scientific representation pragmatic approaches
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1吴彤.科学研究中的表征——从科学实践哲学的立场看[J].哲学分析,2012,3(1):18-30. 被引量:6
  • 2VAN FRAASSEN B. The scientific image [ M ]. Oxford : Ox- ford University Press, 1980.
  • 3VAN FRAASSEN B. The semantic approach to scientific theories[ M]//SKLAR L. The nature of scientific theory. New York : Garland Publishing Inc. ,2000 : 175 - 194.
  • 4VAN FRAASSEN B. Structure and perspective:philosophical perplexity and paradox[ M]//DALLA CHIARA M L, et al. Logic and scientific methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997:511 - 530.
  • 5THOMSON-JONES M. Models and the semantic view [ J ]. Philosophy of science, 2006,73 (5) :524 - 535.
  • 6GIERE R N. Explaining science: a cognitive approach [ M ]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • 7GIERE R N. Scientific perspectivism [ M ]. Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press,2006.
  • 8GIERE R N. An agent-based conception of models and scien- tific epresentation [ J ]. Synthese,2010,172 (2) :269 - 281.
  • 9GIERE R N. Why scientific models should not be regarded as works of fiction [ M ]//SUAREZ M. Fictions in science: Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation. London: Routledge,2009:248 - 258.
  • 10GODFREY-SMITH P. Models and fictions in science [ J ]. Philosophical studies ,2009,143 ( 1 ) : 101 - 116.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Bas C.van Fraassen. Science as Representation:Flouting the Criteria[J].Philosophy of Science,2004.794-804.
  • 2Frederick Suppe. The Structure of a Scientific Paper[J].Philosophy of Science,1998.381-405.
  • 3王铁峰.清华大学博士生学术论坛讲座[M]广东深圳,2007.
  • 4V.G.Hardcastle. Scientific Papers Have Various Structure[J].Philosophy of Science,1999.415-439.
  • 5P.Medawar. Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud[A].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1996.33-39.
  • 6陈瑞麟.科学理论版本的结构与发展[M]台北:台湾大学出版社,20044.
  • 7Jutta Schickore. Doing Science,Writing Science[J].Philosophy of Science,2008.323-343.
  • 8Frederic L.Holmes. Scientific Writing and Scientific Discovery[J].Isis,1987,(02):220-235.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部