摘要
[目的]比较两种颈前路术式治疗双节段颈椎病的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2010~2014年52例双节段颈椎病患者的临床资料,其中颈前路椎体次全切减压+钛网植骨融合内固定术治疗29例(ACCF组),颈前路双节段椎间盘切除减压+Cage植骨融合内固定术治疗23例(ACDF组)。t检验比较两组平均失血量、平均手术时间、NDI评分。方差分析法比较术后JOA评分改善率、内固定沉降率。[结果]ACCF组平均随访时间(25±2.3)个月,ACDF组为(26±1.9)个月。两组患者神经症状均较术前明显改善,JOA评分及术后2年植骨沉降率差异无统计学意义。两组术中平均失血量、平均手术时间、术后2年NDI评分方面差异有统计学意义。平均失血量:ACCF组为(176±28.2)ml,ACDF组(65.7±16.7)ml,P=0.015;平均手术时间:ACCF组为(70±11.2)min,ACDF组(99±15.6)min,P=0.023;术后2年NDI评分:ACCF组为(9.3±3.3),ACDF组(5.2±1.1),P=0.019。[结论]除非出现病椎平面后方较大致压物,双节段ACDF组不能彻底减压的情况,双节段ACDF术式较单节段ACCF更具优势。
[Objective] To assess and compare the clinical effects of two methods of anterior cervical decompression and reconstruction for the treatment of 2-level cervical spondylosis. [Methods] Between 2010 to 2014,52 patients underwent surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis,including 29 who underwent ACCF( anterior cervical corpectomy auto-graft fusion)and 23 who underwent ACDF( anterior cervical discectomy auto-graft fusion). The parameters that we recorded during and after operation included blood loss,operation time,JOA score,NDI score and imaging performance. The data was compared with Student's T-test or ANOVA. [Results] The mean durations of follow-up were( 25 ± 2. 3) months( ACCF) and( 26 ±1. 9) months( ACDF). All the patients had a satisfying neurologic outcome improvement. There were no significant differences in JOA score and sedimentation rate of internal fixation during the follow-up period between the two groups. There were significant differences in blood loss,operation time,and NDI score during the follow-up period between the two groups. The blood loss was significantly more in ACCF than in ACDF group( 176 ± 28. 2ml and 65. 7 ± 16. 7ml per segment,respectively,P =0. 015). The operation time was significant shorter in ACCF than in ACDF group( 70 ± 11. 2 min and 99 ± 15. 6 min per segment,respectively,P = 0. 023). The NDI score was significant higher in ACCF than in ACDF group( 9. 3 ± 3. 3 and 5. 2 ±1. 1,respectively,P = 0. 019). [Conclusion] Anterior cervical discectomy auto-graft fusion with internal fixation is the optimal surgical approach for 2-level cervical spondylosis only when there is large compression in the spinal cord behind vertebra body and can't be removed.
出处
《中国矫形外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第7期594-597,共4页
Orthopedic Journal of China