摘要
目前,"执行难"广泛存在于民事执行中,间接执行以其充分运用社会力量,通过对债务人的人身财产施加强大的压力可以有效提高民事执行的效率。但是我国立法对民事间接强制执行的适用原则、适用范围和适用手段的相关立法缺乏系统性和可操作性,导致现实中间接执行措施运用的混乱。通过比较德国和日本在间接强制执行的不同制度安排,针对我国民事间接强制执行制度在立法上呈现的片段化和混乱化的局面,提出完善该制度的意见。
Nowadays executive difficulty is very common in civil case executions, while indirect compulsory execution can effectively improve the execution by way of wide--use of social strength to produce big stress upon debtor's body and property. However, there are some shortcomings in applying principle, applying scope and applying means of civil indirect compulsory execution, which lead to the disorder of measure application in indirect execution. Through comparing the different rule arrangements between Germany and Japan, the paper has proposed some improving measures to China indirect compulsory execution in civil affairs.
出处
《郧阳师范高等专科学校学报》
2015年第5期94-98,共5页
Journal of Yunyang Teachers College
关键词
间接强制执行措施
域外考察
完善措施
indirect compulsory execution measures
study abroad
complete measures