摘要
目的比较治疗中晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗的化疗方案。方法 96例中晚期宫颈癌患者同步放化疗随机分成顺铂同步放化疗(30例)、紫杉醇同步放化疗(32例)和贝伐单抗同步放化疗组(28例),观察和比较3组的治疗效果和副反应。结果 3组治疗方案的近期有效率分别为96.7%、100%和100%,无显著性差异(P>0.05);顺铂同步放化疗与紫杉醇同步放化疗组相比,5年生存率无显著性差异(P>0.05);顺铂同步放化疗和贝伐单抗同步放化疗相比,5年生存率有显著性差异(P<0.05);紫杉醇同步放化疗和贝伐单抗同步放化疗组相比,5年生存率有显著性差异(P<0.05)。顺铂同步放化疗、紫杉醇同步放化疗有较明显的消化道反应和骨髓抑制,而且肾功损害明显,贝伐单抗同步放化疗组相比有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论贝伐单抗同步放化疗方案与其它两组方案相比,能明显提高患者的生存率,同时副反应相对较轻。
Objective: To compare better chemotherapy method of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy onmedium- and advanced stage cervical cancer. Methods: The 90 cases with medium- and advanced stage cervical cancer treated by concurrent chetherapy and radiotherapy were randomized into three groups: Cisplatin group( 30cases),docetaxel group( 32cases),and bevacizumab group( 28 cases). The curative effectiveand side effect were observed and compared. Results: Effective rate was96. 7% 、100% and 100% for cisplatin group,docetaxel groupand bevacizumab group after radiotherapy,with no significant differenceamong them( P〉0. 05). The rate of 5- year survival was 20% and 18% for Cisplatin group,docetaxel group,lower than bevacizumab group 35%( P〈0. 05),but there was no significant differencebetween the cisplatin and docetaxel group( P〉0. 05). There was obviously side- effect of digestivetract and bone marrow inhibition and kidney damage in cisplatin and docetaxel group,when compared to bevacizumab group 35%( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: Bevacizumab can significantly improve the patients' survival,with less side- effect in medium- and advanced stage cervical cancer.
出处
《泰山医学院学报》
CAS
2015年第12期1356-1359,共4页
Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词
中晚期宫颈癌
同步放化疗
顺铂
紫杉醇
贝伐单抗
medium-and advanced stage cervical cancer
concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy
cisplatin
docetaxel
bevacizumab