摘要
美国艺术哲学家阿瑟·丹托的"艺术终结论"自提出以来,受到了很多学者的称道。但是,丹托在讨论艺术的终结时,却从未论及艺术的起源。从艺术的起源来看,丹托错误地理解了艺术的本质问题。而且,丹托对安迪·沃霍尔的《布里洛盒子》做了过度的阐释,错误地将其认作艺术终结的标志。
"The End of Art" put forward by American art philosopher Arthur Danto has been praised by many scholars. However, he never mentioned the origin of art when he discussed its end. From the point of view of the art origin, he failed to understand the essence of art. In addition, he made an excessive explanation of Andy Warhol's "Brillo Box" and misunderstood it as a sign of the end of art.
出处
《吉林艺术学院学报》
2015年第5期68-72,共5页
Journal of Jilin University of Arts