不同雾化吸入方式治疗支气管哮喘急性发作的临床效果分析

The clinical effect of different atomization inhalation in treatment of acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma

目的:了解支气管哮喘急性发作患者通过不同雾化吸入方式进行治疗的临床效果,为以后患者制定治疗方案提供参考依据.方法:选取我院近年来收治的支气管哮喘急性发作患者80例为研究对象,并根据其接受治疗方案差异随机将其分为A组(n=40)与B组(n=40).A组患者接受超声雾化吸入治疗,B组患者接受流雾化吸入治疗.对比两组患者临床疗效.结果:A组患者临床疗效总有效率为70.0%,B组患者总有效率为95.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:通过雾化吸入方式对支气管哮喘急性发作患者治疗能够取得一定程度的疗效,而通过气流雾化吸入方式给予药物治疗,相对于超声雾化吸入方式对患者疗效更具优越性,有效提高患者的健康水平,改善生活质量,值得临床普及推广.

AIM： To understand the clinical effect of patients with acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma in different ways of inhalation therapy,and provide a reference for making treatment plans in the future. METHODS： A total of 80 patients with bronchial asthma acute attack admitted into our hospital were randomly divided into Group A and Group B according to the difference of the treatment plan,40 cases in each group. Patients in the Group A received the treatment of ultrasonic atomization inhalation,and the patients in the Group B received the treatment of inhalation of the flow. The clinical efficacy of the two groups after treatment was compared. RESULTS： The total effective rate was 70% after treatment in the Group A,while the total effective rate was 95%after treatment in the Group B,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant（ P〈0. 05）. CONCLUSION：The total effective rate was 70% after treatment in the Group A,while the total effective rate was 95% after treatment in the Group B,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant（ P〈0. 05）.