期刊文献+

城市道路拥挤收费下路径选择的演化博弈分析 被引量:1

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Route Choices Under Urban Road Congestion Charging
原文传递
导出
摘要 在城市道路拥挤收费条件下研究出行者出行路径的选择,为政府管理部门提供相关参考。将驾车者划分为高时间价值者和低时间价值者,且居住地和工作地间存在一个包含直达和绕行道路的最简单网络,直达道路在早晚高峰期将征收拥挤费。采用演化博弈的思想,建立了出行者路径选择的效益矩阵,根据雅克比矩阵分析了演化博弈过程的稳定状态,并根据参数的不同分5种情况进行了相应的讨论,最后以算例验证了理论模型的适用性。结果表明,在不征收拥挤费和拥挤费较低时,若拥挤损失大于绕行损失,高、低时间价值者将分别选择直达和绕行道路,反之均倾向于选择直达道路;而在拥挤费较高的情况下,低时间价值者倾向选择绕行以规避直接出行成本的增加,高时间价值者将依然选择直达道路。 The commuters’ travel route choices were studied under urban road congestion so that to provide a reference for the management department of government. The drivers were divided into high VOT( value of time) and low VOT,there existed a single flat network which contained a direct way and a detour way between residence place and employment place,and direct way in morning and evening rush hours would be imposed congestion toll. The research adapted the idea of evolutionary game,established the beneficial matrix of commuters’ travel route choices. The Jacobi matrix was then used to analyze the steady state of evolutionary game process,discussion was conducted according to parameters from five different situations. Finally,a numerical example was given to demonstrate the applicability of the theoretical model. The experimental results show that high VOT commuters would choose direct way while low VOT commuters would choose detour way if congestion loss was greater than rounded loss when the road was free and congestion toll was low,however,if rounded loss was greater than congestion loss,all commuters were inclined to choose direct way. On the contrary,when congestion toll was high,low VOT commuters would choose detour way to avoid increased direct cost while high VOT commuters would still choose direct way.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第9期53-59,共7页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2015-zy-026)
关键词 城市交通 道路拥挤收费 演化博弈 出行路径选择 urban traffic road congestion charging evolutionary game travel route choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献31

  • 1王平平,孙绍荣.车辆牌照拍卖模型[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):75-78. 被引量:6
  • 2吴兵,李林波.交通拥挤的进化动态分析[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(3):106-110. 被引量:6
  • 3林丽萍.基于进化博弈的企业合作竞争ESS分析[J].广西工学院学报,2006,17(3):52-55. 被引量:9
  • 4Hardin G.The tragedy ofthe commons[J].Science,1968,162:1243-1248.
  • 5Joksimovic D,Bliemer MCJ,Bovy PHL.Different policy objectives of the road pricing problem with elastic demand:A game theory approach[R].Research Paper,2004.
  • 6Levinson D.Micro-foundations of congestion and pricing:A game theory perspective[J].Trnsportationn Research A,2005,39:691-704.
  • 7Friedman D.Evolutionary games in economics[J].Eeonometrical,1991,59(3):637-666.
  • 8廖小昕.动力系统的稳定性理论和应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2000.15-30.
  • 9乔根·W·威布尔.演化博弈论[M].王永钦译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
  • 10Ynard Smith J, Price G R. The logic of animal conflict[J]. Nature, 1973, 246: 15-18.

共引文献58

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部