期刊文献+

双车道公路典型减速设施安全评价 被引量:3

Safety evaluation on speed reduction treatments of two-lane road
原文传递
导出
摘要 为有效降低车速、减少双车道公路交通事故的发生,选取"5+7"型、"10+10+10"型、"10+8+6+4+2"型减速标线、橡胶减速垄、比利时路面等典型减速设施和典型路段进行了减速效能试验与分析;利用统计分析方法研究了经过减速设施后车辆运行速度的变化特征,并基于运行速度的连续性,给出了长直线路段减速设施的设置位置。研究结果表明:橡胶减速垄和比利时路面的减速效果明显,但运行速度变化剧烈,对行车舒适性影响较大;减速标线对小车效果明显,随着减速标线组数和条数的增多,减速效果更为明显。研究结果为合理地选择双车道公路减速设施及确定其具体设置参数提供了理论依据。 In order to reduce speed of vehicle and the traffic accident of two-lane road,typical speed reduction treatments,such as "5+7"strips,"10+10+10"strips,"10+8+6+4+2"strips and rubber speed humps,and typical road sections,such as Belgian block pavement were selected to conduct on experiment on reduction efficiency.By using statistical analysis method,the characteristics of operating speed before and after speed reduction treatments were studied.Based on the continuity of operating speed,site of speed reduction treatments on long straight sections was discussed.The results show that rubber speed humps and Belgian block pavement can effectively reduce the speed,but the drastic change of the operating speed has a great influence on the driving comfort.The rumble strips can effectively reduce the speed of cars and with more groups and numbers of rumble strips,the effect is more obvious.The results can provide theoretical basis for the reasonable selection of speed reduction treatments and determination of specific parameters of two-lane road.
出处 《长安大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期91-98,共8页 Journal of Chang’an University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 陕西交通科技项目(12-30K)
关键词 交通工程 双车道公路 减速设施 效果评价 减速标线 减速带 traffic engineering two-lane road speed reduction treatment effectiveness evaluation rumble strip speed hump
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1JTGD81-2006,公路交通安全设施设计规范[S].北京:中华人民共和国交通部,2006.
  • 2GB5768.3-2009,道路交通标志和标线第3部分:道路交通标线[S].
  • 3BREWER J, GERMAN J, KRAMMES R, et al Geometric design practices for European roads[R] Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2001.
  • 4SUN C, EDARA P, KYLE E. Low volume highway work zone evaluation of temporary rumble strips [C]//Transportation Research Board. Proceedings of the 90th TRB Annual Meeting. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board,2011:1424-1429.
  • 5BASSANI M, DALMAZZO D, RIVIERA P P. Field investigation on the effect on operating speed caused by trapezoidal humps[C]//Transportation Research Board. Proceedings of the 90th TRB Annual Meeting. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, 2011 : 3375-3385.
  • 6王超,孙小端,史扬.振动减速带的速度控制效果研究[J].西部交通科技,2009(1):10-13. 被引量:11
  • 7GREEN M,ALLEN M J,ABRAMS B S,et al. Forensic vision with application to highway safety [M]. Tucson : Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, 2011.
  • 8芦薇.国省干道交通安全设施效能分析及评价方法研究[D].西安:长安大学,2012.
  • 9赵跃峰,张生瑞,魏华.隧道群路段运行速度特性分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(6):67-72. 被引量:11
  • 10SUN R,HU J M,XIE X D,et al. Variable speed limit design to relieve traffic congestion based on cooperative vehicle infrastructure system[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 2014,138 : 427-438.

二级参考文献42

共引文献250

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部