一次性包皮环切吻合器与传统包皮环切术的疗效比较

Comparison of the Efficacy of Disposable Circumcision Anastomat and Conventional Circumcision

目的探讨应用一次性包皮环切吻合器与传统包皮环切术的疗效比较。方法对比一次性包皮环切吻合器(DCSD)与传统包皮环切术治疗包茎与包皮过长的疗效。结果两组手术的手术时间、术中失血量及术后满意度比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论一次性包皮环切吻合器较传统包皮环切术操作简单、无需缝合,术中出血少,外观满意,患者易于接受。

Objective To explore the application of disposable circumcision ring cutting anastomat with traditional wrapping ring resection of clinical curative effect comparison. Methods Contrast disposable circumcision ring cut stapler（DCSD） with traditional wrapping ring cutting the efficacy of surgery for the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce. Results Two groups of surgery operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative satisfaction, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Disposable circumcision anastomat than traditional wrapping annulus to cut has the advantages of simple operation, no suture, less bleeding appearance was satisfactory, and is easy to be accepted by patients.