非法证据排除规则适用的实证研究——从“中国裁判文书网”的100份裁判文书谈起

Empirical Research on the Application of Exclusion Rule of Illegal Evidence

根据"中国裁判文书网"随机选取的100份被告方提起非法证据排除申请案件的裁判文书显示:非法实物证据排除规则基本为司法实务所规避,被告方提出申请后排除程序启动及庭前会议的适用较少,法庭在审查过程中可能以对证据的客观真实性判断替代证据非法性判断,目前重复自白的排除规则缺失,侦查人员出庭对辩护律师形成重大挑战。这些现象和问题的发现为立法及司法中更为科学的完善、适用非法证据排除规则提供了方向与指引。

The 100 verdicts from Judicial Opinions of China in which the defendants applied to exclude the illegal evidence display the following： The exclusion rule of illegal physical evidence had been avoided by practice fields. The operation of exclusion procedure and pretrial conference was fewer. The judge of evidence＇s legality was replaced by authenticity in court. There was no exclusion rule of repeated confession, and investigators appeared in court is a great challenge to defense lawyers. The discovery of the phenomena and issues is guide to perfect exclusion rule of illegal evidence in legislation and justice scientifically.