期刊文献+

微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术联合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定长节段融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧弯 被引量:16

Clinical study on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)联合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定长节段融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧弯的临床疗效。方法 采用MIS-TLIF联合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定长节段融合术治疗17例退行性腰椎侧弯患者,比较术前和术后1周、3个月、末次随访时视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和36条简明健康状况调查表(SF-36)评分,以及X线测量冠状位Cobb角、矢状位前凸角、冠状位和矢状位躯干偏移,X线或CT判断椎体融合率,MRI评价减压程度。结果 17例患者手术融合56个椎体节段(T12~S1节段);平均手术时间200 min,术中出血量320 ml,住院时间8.21 d,术后随访12.13个月。与术前相比,术后1周、3个月和末次随访时VAS(均P=0.000)和ODI(均P=0.000)评分均减少,SF-36评分增加(均P=0.000),冠状位Cobb角(均P=0.000)、矢状位前凸角(均P=0.000)、冠状位和矢状位躯干偏移(均P=0.000)均减小。至末次随访时,ODI改善率(86.51±6.02)%,椎体融合率达89.21%,且螺钉位置良好。无一例出现术后神经功能缺损、感染、脑脊液漏等严重并发症,无一例内固定失败、椎弓根螺钉和钛棒断裂或Cage移位,无死亡病例。结论 MIS-TLIF联合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定长节段融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧弯具有手术创伤小、术中出血量少、并发症发生率低、矫形效果好、疗效确切等优点,尽管存在手术时间和学习曲度较长等缺点,但仍是退行性腰椎侧弯微创治疗的有效方法。 Objective To discuss the operative essentials and therapeutic effects of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS- TLIF) combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar seoliosis (DLS). Methods A total of 17 DLS patients without prior spinal diseases were treated by MIS- TLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation from January 2013 to September 2015 in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complication were recorded in each patient. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate postoperative improvement of low back and leg pain, and clinical effects were assessed according to Medical Outcome Study 36-hem Short-Form Health Survey (SF- 36). Coronal Cobb angle, sagittal lordosis angle and spinal deviation distances on coronal and sagittal plane were measured before operation, one week, 3 months after operation and in the last follow-up in spinal full-length X-ray examination. Fusion rate was calculated according to X-ray or CT scan, and the degree of decompression was evaluated by MRI. Results Decompression and fusion levels ranged from T-S vertebrae, and interbody fusion was performed in 17 patients and 56 levels were fused. Average operation time was 200 rain (180-300 rain), intraoperative blood loss was 320 ml (200-1000 ml) and hospital stay was 8.21 d (5-12 d). All patients were followed-up for 12.13 months (5-24 months). Compared with preoperation, VAS (P = 0.000, for all) and ODI scores (P = 0.000, for all) decreased significantly, SF-36 score increased (P = 0.000, for all), coronal Cobb angle (P = 0.000, for all), sagittal lordosis angle (P = 0.000, for all), coronal and sagittal deviation (P = 0.000, for all) decreased significantly one week and 3 months after operation and in the last follow-up, The improvement rate of ODI was (86.51 ± 6.02)%, fusion rate of vertebral bodies was 89.21%, and the position of screws was good. No neurological defect, infection, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage occurred after operation. No pedicle screw or rod breakage or Cage displacements was found. There was no death case. Conclusions MIS-TLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is an effective technique for treatment of DLS patients, with less injury, less intraoperative blood loss, low complication incidence, good scoliosis correction and definite therapeutic effects, even this method needs more operation time and longer learning curve.
出处 《中国现代神经疾病杂志》 CAS 2016年第4期197-203,共7页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
关键词 脊柱侧凸 腰椎 脊柱融合术 内固定术(非Me SH词) 外科手术 微创性 Surgical procedures,vertebrae Spinal fusion Internal fixation (not in MESH)
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Aebi M. The adult seoliosis. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14:925-948.
  • 2Bach K, Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian A, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive surgical techniques in adult degenerative spinal deformity: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472:1749-1761.
  • 3吴浩,陈永杰,张璨,陈赞,菅凤增.应用经皮椎弓根螺钉技术治疗腰椎退行性疾病[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(23):1764-1768. 被引量:12
  • 4Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25:2940-2953.
  • 5Yang C, Yang M, Chen Y, Wei X, Ni H, Chen Z, Li J, Bai Y, Zhu X, Li M. Radiographic parameters in adult degenerative scoliosis and different parameters between sagittal balanced and imbalanced ADS patients. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94:E1198.
  • 6Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluationand management. Neurosurg Focus, 2010, 28:E1.
  • 7Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, Park JH. The prevalence and radiological findings in 1347 elderly patients with scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 92:980-983.
  • 8Gremeaux V, Casillas JM, Fabbro-Peray P, Pelissier J, Herisson C, Perennou D. Analysis of low back pain in adults with scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33:402-405.
  • 9Shufifebarger H, Suk SI, Mardjetko S. Determining the upper instrumented vetrebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at TJ0 versus L~. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(19 Suppl):185-194.
  • 10Pritchett JW, Bortel DT. Degenerative symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1993, 18:700-703.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Sihvonen T, Heruo A, Paljarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome [ J ]. Spine, 1993, 18:575-581.
  • 2Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation [J]. Spine, 2005, 30: 123- 129.
  • 3Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion [ J ]. Spine, 2006,31:712-716.
  • 4Kotani Y, Aburai K, Ito M, et al. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screwsversus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis [ J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21:1171-1177.
  • 5Park P, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcome after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up [ J ]. Neurosurg Focus,2008, 25 :E16.
  • 6Sehwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et al. Minimallyinvasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) : technical feasibility and initial results [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005,18 Suppl : S1 -S6.
  • 7Lawton CD, Smith ZA. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2011,55:259-264.
  • 8Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index [ J ]. Spine, 2000,25 : 2940-2952.
  • 9Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion ( author's transl) [ J]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1982, 120:343-347.
  • 10Mathews HH, Long BH. Endoscope assisted percutaneous anterior interbody fusion with subcutaneoussuprafascialinteral fixation: evolution of technique and surgical considerations [J]. Orthop Int Ed, 1995, 3:456-500.

共引文献11

同被引文献138

引证文献16

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部