期刊文献+

Web2.0及数字媒体时代混音音乐的合法性及许可模式探讨 被引量:4

The Legality & Licensing System of Music Mash-ups in the Web2.0 Digital Remix Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Web2.0网络时代的到来以及数字媒体技术的迅速发展,使传统著作权领域"著作权人与消费者分离"的只读文化,转型为"著作权人与消费者结合"的读写文化,混音创作由此诞生并开始盛行。然而作为全新的创作形式,混音作品尚处在著作权法的灰色地带。因此,借鉴美国相关判例及研究,探讨我国著作权法制度下混音作品的合法性、各类许可机制的有效性以及侵权例外抗辩规则的适用性。探索平衡混音创作人与原作著作权人的权益的最佳路径,使著作权法与技术更新相适应。 In the age of Web2.0 where the digital media is changing rapidly, the traditional read-only culture which separates the copyright holders and consumers has been transformed to the read & write culture which combines the two. This revolution has resulted in an explosion in the production of remix works. However, as the new form of musical creativity, the remix work especially the music mash-ups still remains in the margin of Copyright Law. Thus, this article will analyze the legality of music mash-ups, the feasibility of various licensing mechanisms and the applicability of infringement exception rules based on the American legal cases and researches, in order to find out optimal way to balance the rights and interests between music mash-ups creators and copyright holders as well as to fix the current Chinese Copyright Law be better suited to the digital remix era.
作者 蒋洁如
出处 《电子知识产权》 2016年第3期53-60,共8页 Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词 混音作品 演绎作品 CC协议 默示许可 合理使用 Music Mash-Ups Derivative Work Creative Commons Implied License Fair Use
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1See Michael Katz: Recycling Copyright Survival And Growth In The Remix Age, 13 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 21 2008-2009, pp.33.
  • 2See Emily Harper: Music Mashups: Testing The Limits Of Copyright Law As Remix Culture Takes Society By Slorm, 39 Hotlra L. Rev. 405 2010-201 l,pp 4 6-417.
  • 3王迁.论汇编作品的著作权保护[J].法学,2015(2):35-49. 被引量:71
  • 4Robert M. Vrana: The Remix Artist's Catch-22: A Proposal for Compulsory Licensing tbr Transtbnnative, SamplingBased Music, 68 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 8 l 1 201 l, pp852-860.
  • 5See Lawrence Lessig: Frec(lng) Culture For Remix, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 961 2004, pp.961-975.
  • 6李建华,王国柱.网络环境下著作权默示许可与合理使用的制度比较与功能区分[J].政治与法律,2013(11):12-24. 被引量:20
  • 7See 17 U.S. Code 107. 11. See CAMPBELL v. ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC ,http://wv.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/199392_ 1292/.
  • 8See CAMPBELL v. ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC ,https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm[/92-1292.ZS.html.
  • 9See KERRI EBLE: Remixing Music Copyright To Better Protect Mash-up Artist, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 661 2013,PR671.
  • 10See Newton v. Diamond 349 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2003), http://mcir.usc.edu/cases/2000-2009/Pages/newtondiamond.hmll.

二级参考文献70

  • 1吕炳斌.反思著作权法——从Google数字图书馆说起[J].图书馆杂志,2007,26(5):3-7. 被引量:24
  • 2.《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库》[DB].,.
  • 3.《著作权法实施条例》第2条.,..
  • 4《伯尔尼公约》第2条第5款
  • 5《伯尔尼公约》.
  • 6Wendy J. Gordon:Fair-use as market failure :A structure and economic analysis of the betamax ease and its predecessors,Columbia Law Review,Vol. 82,No. 8,1982,PP. 1614-1618,PP. 1655.
  • 7Orit Fischman Afori,lmplied License:An Emerging New Standard in Copyright Law, Santa Clara Computer&High Tech. L.J,V ol.25,No. 2,2009,PP. 306,PP. 307-308.
  • 8Seshadri, Raghu:Bridging the Digital Divide: How the Implied License Doctrine Could Narrow the Copynorm-Copyright Gap,UCLA J.L. & Tech. 3,Vol. 11, No. 2,2007,PP. 26.
  • 9John S. Sieman:Using the implied License To Inject Common Sense into Digital Copyright, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007, PP. 889.
  • 10Gordon Roy Parker v. Yahoo!,Ine.,U.S. Dist. LEXIS74512, at 18(E.D. Pa.,2008).

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部