大学英语作文错误分析及应对策略研究—以济南大学为例被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要对济南大学非英语专业学生作文错误进行分析,发现过度概括、形式与意义的错配、缺少约定俗成性是产生错误的主要原因。针对这类错误,提出在认知构式理论框架指导下的英语教学。

作者董涛

机构地区济南大学外国语学院

出处《山东广播电视大学学报》 2016年第2期24-27,共4页 Journal of Shandong Radio and TV University

基金 2014年济南大学校级教学研究项目"大学英语写作错误分析与应对策略研究--以济南大学期末作文答卷为例"(项目编号:J1436)

关键词错误分析过度概括认知构式教学策略

参考文献7

1Brown, H. D. Principles of Language learning and Teaching [ M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Re- search Press, 2002.
2Goldberg, A. E. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
3Goldberg, A.E. Constructions : A New theoretical approach to language [ J ]. Journal of Foreign Languages. 2003,(3) :1 -11.
4Goldberg, A.E. Construction at work : The nature of generalization in language [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 2006.
5Tomasello, M. Constructing a Language : A Usage - Based Theory of Language Acquisition[ M]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. 2003.
6王初明.构式和构式语境与第二语言学习[J].现代外语,2015,38(3):357-365. 被引量：41
7张晓鹏,马武林.语言输入的频率分布对中国学生习得英语抽象构式的影响[J].现代外语,2014,37(1):74-84. 被引量：15

1王初明.论外语学习的语境[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(3):190-197. 被引量：236
2Bolinger, D. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication [ J ]. Lingua (2) 18-34.
3Bowerman, M. 1988. The 'no negative evidence problem' : How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar [A]? In J. A. Hawkins (ed.). Explaining Language Universals [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 73-101.
4de Bot, K. & D. Larsen-Freeman. 2011. Researching second language development from a dynamic system theory perspective [A]. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (eds.). A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 5-23.
5Ellis, N. 2007. The associative-cognitive CREED EA]. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds.). Theories in Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 77-95.
6Eskildsen, S. W. 2012. L2 negation constructions at work [J]. Language Learning 62(2): 335- 372.
7Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Construction: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
8Goldberg, A. E. 2003. Construction: A new theoretical approach to language [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science 7(5) : 219-224.
9Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
10Peng, J. 2014. Willingness to Communicate in the Chinese EFL University Classroom [M]. Toronto: Matters.