期刊文献+

超声BI-RADS 3类和4A类病变分类的影响因素 被引量:6

Influence Factors of Ultrasound Breast Lesion Classification with BI-RADS Category 3 and 4A
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨患者年龄及病灶大小对乳腺超声BI-RADS(乳腺影像报告和数据系统)3类和4A类病变分类的影响。方法:依据BI-RADS分类标准,对405例乳腺BI-RADS 3类(240例)及4A类(165例)患者年龄及病灶大小进行分析。结果:240例BI-RADS 3类中良性病灶240例(100%),恶性病灶0例;165例BI-RADS 4A类中良性病灶158例(95.76%),恶性病灶7例(4.24%)。在BI-RADS 3类和4A类病变分类中,患者年龄差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),病灶大小差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);BI-RADS 4A类良、恶性病灶中,患者年龄差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:患者年龄对BI-RADS3类和4A类乳腺病变分类具有重要的意义,而病灶大小对分类意义不大。 Objective: To investigate the effects of age and the lesions size on diagnosis of category 3 and 4A in breast imaging report and data system(BI-RADS). Methods: Age, lesions size and ultrasound lesion classification according to the BI-RADS of 405 cases(240 cases diagnosed BI-RADS category 3 and 165 cases diagnosed BI-RADS category 4A)of reports were conducted a retrospective analysis. Results: Among 240 cases BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 240 cases(100%)were benign, and no case(0%)was malignant.While among 165 cases BI-RADS category 4A lesions, there were 158 cases of benign(95.76%), and 7 cases of malignant(4.24%).Data showed a statistical significance between age difference and diagnosis classification(P〈0.05), but no statistical significance between lesion size and diagnosis classification(P〈0.05). The age of patients were found to have significant influence on pathological diagnosis in category 4A lesions(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Age, but not lesion size, significantly influenced breast lesions diagnosis with BI-RADS category 3 and 4 A.
出处 《大理大学学报》 CAS 2016年第2期55-57,共3页 Journal of Dali University
关键词 BI-RADS分类 患者年龄 超声诊断 影响因素 BI-RADS category age of patients ultrasound diagnosis influence factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1张保宁.乳腺癌临床研究的回顾与展望[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):7-8. 被引量:47
  • 2吴松松,陈亚青.乳腺癌超声诊断进展[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(4):623-626. 被引量:33
  • 3Agarwal G,Pradeep P,Aggarwal V,et al.Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women.World J Surg,2007,31(5):1031-1040.
  • 4American College of Radiology BI-RADS:ultrasound.1st ed.Breast imaging reporting and data system:BI-RADS atlas.4th ed.American College of Radiology,Reston,VA:2003.
  • 5Lo JY,Markey MK,Baker JA,et al.Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2002,178(2):457-463.
  • 6Lehman C,Holt S,Peacock S,et al.Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS Guidelines by community radiologists:concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2002,179(1):15-20.
  • 7Stavros AT,Thickman D,Rapp CL,et al.Solid breast nodules:use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.Radiology,1995,196(1):123-134.
  • 8Berg WA,Blume JD,Cormack JB,et al.Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom:results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators.Radiology,2006,239(3)693-702.
  • 9Uematsu T,Yuen S,Kasami M,et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast:is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat,2007,103(3):269-281.
  • 10Timmers JM,VD-N HJ,Z HM,et al.The breast imaging reposing and data system(BI-1LADS)in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as anssessment and stratification tool.Eur Radiol,2012, 22(8):1717-1723.

共引文献97

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部