期刊文献+

TASCC型股浅动脉闭塞病变腔内治疗的临床分析 被引量:2

Clinical analysis on endovascular treatment for TASC type C occlusion of superficial femoral artery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察泛大西洋协作组织共识(TASC)c型股浅动脉闭塞(或狭窄〉70%)腔内治疗效果及随访1年结果,分析支架内再狭窄(ISR)的相关因素。方法回顾首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院普通外科2011年5月至2014年5月期间收治的患下肢动脉硬化闭塞症TASCC型的患者58例(58条肢体)。手术方法为血管腔内球囊扩张+支架置入术。术后1年随访是否有支架内再闭塞或狭窄(〉70%)。根据是否发生支架内再闭塞或狭窄(〉70%),将患者分为通畅组及再闭塞组,分析比较两组患者的临床资料。结果58例患者无围术期死亡。58条肢体中有6条未能开通,腔内治疗开通率为89.7%。1年后完成随访41例,通畅组30例,再闭塞组11例。两组患者踝肱指数相比差异具有统计学意义[(0.55±0.16)VS(0.41±0.24),P〈0.05]。两组患者的吸烟者比例和Fontaine分期虽无显著性差异,但尸值相对较低,提示二者也可能与术后ISR相关。结论腔内治疗TASCC型股浅动脉闭塞安全有效,血管病变严重程度与IsR相关。 Objective To observe the clinical efficiency of endovascular treatment for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) type C occlusion of superficial femoral artery (SFA) or more than 70% stenosis and the outcomes in 1 year's follow up, and investigate the relevant factors of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods Clinical data of 58 cases(58 limbs) suffering from TASC type C occlusion of SFA or more than 70% stenosis in our hospital from May 2011 to May 2014 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All of them received endovascular balloon dilatation and stent implantation. According to whether there was any occlusion or more than 70% stenosis in 1 year postoperatively, the patients were divided into patency group and re-occlusion group. Clinical data were compared and analyzed between the 2 groups. Results No perioperative death was found in the 58 patients. Out of 58 limbs there were 6 limbs not getting patency, with a patency rate of 89.7%. In 1 year's follow-up, there were 41 cases with complete follow-up, and 30 of them were accordingly assigned to the patency group and the other 11 to the re-occlusion group. There was significant difference in ankle-brachial index between the 2 groups [(0.55 ± 0.16) vs (0.41 ± 0.24), P〈 0.05]. Though there were no significant differences in the ratio of smokers and Fontaine stage between them, the P value was comparatively smaller, which might suggest that the 2 indices were associated with ISR. Conclusion Endovascular treatment is safe and effective in the treatment of TASC type C occlusion of SFA. The severity of vascular disease is associated with restenosis.
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2016年第3期190-193,共4页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
关键词 动脉硬化闭塞症 下肢 股浅动脉 腔内治疗 支架内再狭窄 arteriosclerosis obliterans, lower extremity superficial femoral artery endovascular therapy in-stent restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1王洪剑,邓钢,秦永林,李国昭,柏志斌,何仕诚,郭金和,丁惠娟,沈志萍.球囊扩张或(和)支架植入术治疗股浅动脉狭窄或闭塞的中远期疗效[J].介入放射学杂志,2012,21(10):810-815. 被引量:19
  • 2李兴,俞恒锡.TASCⅡ分级对下肢动脉硬化闭塞病变外科治疗的指导作用[J].北京医学,2012,34(2):131-133. 被引量:5
  • 3Forbes JF, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al. Bypass versusAngioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg(BASIL) trial:health-related quality of life outcomes, resourceutilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. J Vase Surg,2010,51(5 Suppl): 43S-51S.
  • 4Salvatore ST, Rzucidlo EM, Bjerke AA,et al. Long-termresults of open and endovascular revascularization ofsuperficial femoral artery occlusive disease[J]. J VaseSurg, 2011, 54(3): 714-721.
  • 5王深明,王斯文.血管外科现代临床的难点和热点问题探讨[J].中国实用外科杂志,2014,34(1):19-23. 被引量:16
  • 6Baril DT, Chaer RA, Rhee RY, et al. Endovascularinterventions for TASC II D femoropopliteal lesions[J]. JVase Surg, 2010,51(6): 1406-1412.
  • 7Han DK, Shah TR, Ellozy SH, et al. The success ofendovascular therapy for all TransAtlantic SocietyConsensus graded femoropopliteal lesions[J]. Ann VaseSurg, 2011,25(1): 15—24.
  • 8Gandini R,Fabiano S,Spano S, et al. Randomized controlstudy of the outback LTD reentry catheter versus manualreentry for the treatment of chronic total occlusions in thesuperficial femoral artery[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2013,82 (3): 485-492.
  • 9Yeh KH, Tsai YJ,Huang HL,et al. Dual vascular access forcritical limb ischemia: immediate and follow-up results[J],Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,77(2): 296-302.
  • 10陈佳佺,施娅雪,叶猛,张纪蔚,张岚.泛大西洋协作组织共识C和D型股腘动脉病变患者腔内治疗的疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2010,90(35):2486-2490. 被引量:7

二级参考文献53

  • 1殷敏毅,蒋米尔.下肢动脉粥样硬化急性闭塞的腔内溶栓治疗[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2012,4(2):72-74. 被引量:2
  • 2殷敏毅,黄新天,陆信武,李维敏,黄英,陆民,蒋米尔.TASCⅡ C、D型股腘动脉闭塞腔内治疗的操作技巧与疗效分析[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2011,3(2):94-97. 被引量:10
  • 3孟庆义,刘兆轩,王瑞华.介入治疗下肢动脉缺血性疾病[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2009,1(1):36-38. 被引量:8
  • 4Norgren L,Hiatt WR,Dormandy JA,et al.Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC Ⅱ).J Vasc Surg,2007,45 Suppl:5-67.
  • 5Surowiec SM,Davies MG,Eberly SW,et al.Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery.J Vasc Surg,2005,41:269-278.
  • 6Dosluoglu HH,Cherr GS,Lall P.Stenting vs above knee polytetrafluoroethylene bypass for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus-Ⅱ C and D superficial femoral artery disease.J Vasc Surg,2008,48:1166-1174.
  • 7Conrad MF,Cambria RP,Stone DH,et al.Intermediate results of percutaneous endovascular therapy of femoropopliteal occlusive disease:a contemporary series.J Vasc Surg,2006,44:762-769.
  • 8Rabellino M,Zander T,Baldi S.Clinical follow-up in endovascular treatment for TASC C-D lesions in femoro-popliteal segment.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2009,73:701-705.
  • 9Jamsen TS,Manninen HI,Jaakkola PA,et al.Long-term outcome of patients with claudication after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries.Radiology,2002,225:345-352.
  • 10Conrad MF,Kang J,Cambria RP.Infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty for the treatment of chronic occlusive disease.J Vasc Surg,2009,50:799 -805.

共引文献53

同被引文献43

  • 1Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-SocietyConsensus for the Management of Peripheral ArterialDisease (TASC H)[J]. J Vase Surg, 2007, (45 Suppl S):S5—S67.
  • 2Werk M,Langner S, Reinkensmeier B,et al. Inhibition ofrestenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coatedversus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomizedpilot trial[J]. Circulation, 2008, 118(13): 1358-1365.
  • 3Saxon RR,Dake MD, Volgelzang RL,et al.Randomized, multicenter study comparing expandedpolytetrafluoroethylene-covered endoprosthesis placementwith percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatmentof superficial femoral artery occlusive disease[J]. J VaseInterv Radiol, 2008, 19(6): 823-832.
  • 4Krankenberg H,Schluter M, Steinkamp HJ,et al. Nitinolstent implantation versus percutaneous transluminalangioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to10cm in length: the Femoral Artery Stenting Trial(FAST)[J]_ Circulation, 2007,116(3): 285-292.
  • 5Goodney PP,Beck AW, Nagle J, et al. National trends inlower extremity bypass surgery, endovascularinterventions, and major amputations[J]. J Vase Surg,2009,50(1): 54-60.
  • 6Baril DT, Chaer RA, Rhee RY, et al. Endovascularinterventions for TASC H D femoropopliteal lesions[J].JVasc Surg, 2010,51(6): 1406-1412.
  • 7Ye W, Liu CW, Ricco JB, et al. Early and late outcomes ofpercutaneous treatment of TransAtlantic Inter-SocietyConsensus class C and D aorto-iliac lesions[J]. J VaseSurg, 2011, 53(6): 1728-1737.
  • 8Indes JE, Pfaff MJ, Farrokhyar F,et al. Clinicaloutcomes of 5 358 patients undergoing direct openbypass or endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusivedisease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JEndovasc Ther, 2013,20(4): 443-455.
  • 9Jaff MR, White CJ, Hiatt WR, et al. An update onmethods for revascularization and expansion of the TASClesion classification to include below-the-knee arteries: asupplement to the Inter-Society Consensus for theManagement of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II )[J].J Endovasc Ther, 2015, 22(5): 663-677.
  • 10Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versusAngioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL):multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2005,366(9501): 1925-1934.

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部