期刊文献+

NV8新生儿呼吸机临床试验 被引量:2

Clinical Trial of NV8 Neonatal Ventilator
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨NV8新生儿呼吸机四种无创模式的有效性及安全性。方法:选取2014年10月至2015年1月需要无创呼吸支持的新生儿108例,随机分为试验组(NV8呼吸机)和对照组(美国康尔福盛公司Infant Flow Si PAP婴儿呼吸机),各组根据病情选用不同辅助通气模式6小时。观察各组试验前后血气变化、不良事件发生率。结果:NCPAP组、NIPPV/SNIPPV组、HFNC组中试验组与对照组相比,动脉血氧分压、二氧化碳分压、血PH值变化无统计学差异(P〉0.05),NCPAP组试验组动脉氧分压非劣效界值下限低于对照组,余组各指标的95%CI下限均大于非劣效界值。各组均未出现不良事件。结论:NV8新生儿呼吸机在新生儿中应用具有有效性和安全性。 Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of four noninvasive modes by NV8 ventilator in newborns.Methods:The study was carried out from October 2014 to January 2015,108 patients with non-invasive respiratory support were randomized to experimental group(NV8)and control group(Infant Flow Si PAP,USA),according to the patient's condition each group was selected to use different ventilation mode for 6 hours.The changes of blood gas analysis,the incidence of adverse events were observed before and after the experiment.Results:in NCPAP group,NIPPV/SNIPPV group,HFNC group,arterial oxygen partial pressure,carbon dioxide pressure,blood p H changes had no significant difference between experimental group and control group(P〉0.05),in NCPAP group,The lower limit of non inferiority value of arterial oxygen partial pressure in experimental group was lower than in control group,The lower bounds of the 95%CI in the other groups were larger than the non inferiority margin.No adverse events occurred in all groups.Conclusion:it was effective and safe in neonates by using NV8 ventilator.
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2016年第4期36-40,共5页 China Medical Device Information
基金 深圳市卫计委科研项目(重点学科能力提升类,项目编号:201506004)
关键词 经鼻持续正压通气 经鼻间歇正压通气 经鼻高流量给氧 新生儿 nasal continuous positive airway pressure nasal intermittent positive airway pressure high-flow nasal cannula newborn
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1.Patel RM, Kandefer S, Walsh MC, et al. Causes and Timing of Death in Extremely Premature Infants from 2000 through 2011 [J].N Engl J Med. 2015,372(4):331-340.
  • 2Fischer HS, Bfihrer C. Avoiding Endotracheal Ventilation to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis [J]. Pediatrics,2013, 132(5): 1351 - 1360.
  • 3Schmolzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, et al. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm inthnts at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].BMJ.2013,347:5980.
  • 4Owen LS, Morley C J, Davis PG. Effects of synchronisation during SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants [J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2015,100(1): 24-30.
  • 5杨建生,吴本清,贺务实,燕旭东.经鼻间歇正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效观察[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2011,26(5):315-318. 被引量:74
  • 6Miedema M, van der Burg PS, Beuger S, et al. Effect of nasal continuous and biphasic positive airway pressure on lung volume in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr.2013;162(4):691-697.
  • 7Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, et al. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action[J].Respir Med,2009,103 ( 10): 1400-1405.
  • 8Haq I, Gopalakaje S, Fenton AC, et al. The evidence for high flow nasal cannula devices in infants[J].Paediatr Respir Rev, 2014,15(2):124-134.
  • 9Chang HY, Claure N, D'ugard C, et al. Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants[J].Pediatr Res, 2011,69(1):84-89.
  • 10Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP tbr respiratory support in neonates[J].Pediatries,2013,131 (5): 1482-1490.

二级参考文献15

  • 1冯琪.支气管肺发育不良[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2006,21(1):59-61. 被引量:10
  • 2Owen LS, Morley C J, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal neonatal Ed,2008,93 :F148-150.
  • 3Bancalari E ,Claure N. Mechanical ventilatory support in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr, 2008, 60: 177-182.
  • 4Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very prete~l infants. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358 : 700-708.
  • 5Lampland AL,Meyers PA, Worwa CT, et al. Gas exchange and lung inflammation using nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in piglets with saline lavage-induced lung injury : an observational study. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36:183-187.
  • 6Ali N, Claure N, Alegria X, et al. Effects of non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NI-PSV) on ventilation and respiratory effort in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2007,42 : 704 -710.
  • 7Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation ( SNIPPV ) decreases work of breathing ( WOB ) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Pediatr Pulmonol, 2006,41 : 875- 881.
  • 8Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation : what do we know in 2007 ? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2007, 92: F414-418.
  • 9Bhandari V, Gavino RG, Nedrelow JH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol,2007 ,27 :697-703.
  • 10Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr,2007 ,150 :521-526.

共引文献73

同被引文献14

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部