期刊文献+

高场磁共振在乳腺癌诊断及治疗效果评价中的价值分析 被引量:1

Value Analysis of High Field Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer and the Evaluation of Treatment Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高场磁共振在乳腺癌诊断及治疗效果评价中的价值。方法整群选择2012年8月—2014年12月在该院就诊的175例疑似乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,使用高场磁共振和B超联合钼靶检查对其进行辅助检查。结果175例疑似患者中97例患者确诊为乳腺癌。乳腺癌患者检出率比较发现,高场磁共振共为64.95%,B超联合钼靶X线为50.52%,高场磁共振检出率明显高于B超联合钼靶X线(P<0.05);经过化疗后,97例患者共72例患者有效,总有效率为74.23%;化疗有效组ADC、最大强化率、最大排泄率均明显高于化疗无效组,病灶最大径低于无效组(P<0.05)。结论高场磁共振对于乳腺癌的早期诊断及化疗效果的评价有明显作用。 Objective To discuss the value of high field magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of breast cancer and the evaluation of treatment effect. Methods 175 cases of suspected breast cancer patients treated in our hospital from August2012 to December 2014 were selected as the research object and were given auxiliary examinations including high field magnetic resonance and type-B ultrasonic combined with molybdenum target. Results Of the 175 cases of patients, 97 cases were diagnosed as the breast cancer, the detection rate of high field magnetic resonance was obviously higher than that of type-B ultrasonic combined with molybdenum target x-ray(64.95% vs 50.52%)(P〈0.05); after chemotherapy, 72 cases of patients were effective of the 97 cases, the total effective rate was 74.23%, the ADC, maximum enhancement rate and maximum excretion rate in the chemotherapy effective group were obviously higher than those in the chemotherapy ineffective group, the lesion maximum diameter in the chemotherapy effective group was lower than that in the chemotherapy ineffective group(P〈0.05). Conclusion High field magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of breast cancer and the evaluation of chemotherapy effect has an obvious effect.
作者 冯庆亮 刘艳
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第4期187-188,193,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 高场磁共振 乳腺癌 诊断 疗效评价 High field magnetic resonance Breast cancer Diagnosis Curative effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献102

  • 1顾雅佳,汪晓红,肖勤,杨文涛,曾炜,唐峰,毛健,郑晓静,彭卫军,冯晓源.乳腺导管原位癌及其微浸润的磁共振成像评价[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(3):248-253. 被引量:43
  • 2Rebecca S, Elizabeth W, Otis B, et al. The impact of eliminating so- cioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61:212.
  • 3Ting-Kai Leung, Pai-Jung Huang, Chi-Ming Lee, et al. Can Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstrate Characteristic Findings of Preoperative Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Taiwan Residents Women? Asian Journal of Surgery ,2010,33 : 143.
  • 4American College of Radiology(ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4thed, Reston : American Cofiege of Radiol- ogy, 2003,1.
  • 5Alexander H, Andrea T, Marcus S, et al. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR,2002,179 : 1493.
  • 6Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Pre- operative Assessment of Breast Cancer. Radiology,2004,233:830.
  • 7Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cane-er: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asympto- matic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A system- atic review. BMC Cancer,2009,9:335.
  • 8Nagao Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sugiyama Y, et al. Relationship between mammographie density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women : a case-control study. Breast Cancer,2003,10:228.
  • 9Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2003,12:332.
  • 10van Gils CH, Otten JD, Hendriks JH, et al. High mammographic breast density and its implications for the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen, 1999,6:200.

共引文献102

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部