期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择的临床分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择,提高瘢痕子宫分娩安全性。方法:随机抽取在我院接受分娩的瘢痕子宫产妇170例,同时选取80例经阴道分娩的非瘢痕子宫妊娠产妇,回顾产妇临床资料及分娩方式。结果:170例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩产妇,62例选择阴道试产,50例成功,占80.6%;剖宫产120例,占70.6%。剖宫产产妇出血量、产褥病率、住院时间较阴道分娩产妇高,P<0.05;新生儿Apgar评分无显著差异,P>0.05。阴道分娩成功的瘢痕子宫产妇出血量、产褥病、住院时间、新生儿Apgar评分与非瘢痕子宫妊娠产妇相比,P>0.05。结论:瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩依然以手术分娩为主;而临床在掌握阴道分娩指征,确保阴道分娩的安全性和可靠性较高的情况下,可采取阴道试产。
作者 吴爱华
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2016年第3期216-217,共2页 Women's Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1窦伯梅,范明秀.疤痕子宫对再次妊娠分娩结局危险性的分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(22):492-493. 被引量:4
  • 2李彦军,吴俊改.剖宫产后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2007,6(3):50-52. 被引量:20
  • 3Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect : correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,34( 1 ):85-89.
  • 4Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM, et al. Method of deliv- ery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on ma- ternal and perinatal health 2007-08 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) : 4490 -4491.
  • 5Allomuvor GF, Xue M, Zhu X, et al. The definition, aetiology, presen- tation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects [ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33 (8) :759-763.
  • 6Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, et al. Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery[ J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ,2012,41 ( 8 ) :708-726.
  • 7Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, et al. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo- natal outcomes in future pregnancies[J]. J Periuatol,2009,29( 11 ) : 726-730.
  • 8Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in an inner-city hospital in Lagos, Nigeria [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (2) :135-139.
  • 9Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographie evaluation of the lower uterine segment[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,201 (3) :320.
  • 10Xirasagar S,Lin HC,Liu TC. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan[J].Health Policy and Planning,2006,(04):319-325.doi:10.1093/heapol/czl015.

共引文献316

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部