导管溶栓联合下腔静脉滤器植入治疗深静脉血栓患者的综合护理干预效果分析

Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated by Catheter Thrombolysis and Implantation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter

目的研究并探讨导管溶栓联合下腔静脉滤器植入治疗深静脉血栓患者的综合护理干预效果。方法方便选取100例深静脉血栓患者进行研究,选取自2013年1月—2015年1月。采取数字抽签法进行分组,分为各有50例患者的对照组和观察组。两组患者均进行导管溶栓联合下腔静脉滤器植入治疗,在治疗过程中,对照组患者给予常规护理干预,观察组患者给予综合护理干预。对比两组患者治疗前后的大腿、小腿周径差值改善情况,并对比两组患者的生活质量评分以及并发症发生情况。结果与对照组相比,治疗后观察组的大腿和小腿周径差值的改善幅度均更加显著(P<0.05)。观察组患者的生活质量总评分为(80.24±6.71)分,明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者的并发症发生率为2%,明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对深静脉血栓患者进行导管溶栓联合下腔静脉滤器植入治疗,并在治疗过程中配合综合护理干预,具有显著的临床效果。

Objective To study the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on deep vein thrombosis treated by catheter thrombolysis and implantation of inferior vena cava filter. Methods 100 patients with deep vein thrombosis admitted from January 2013 to January 2015 were selected as the subjects and divided into the control group, and the observation group in accordance with the digital drawing method. Both groups underwent catheter thrombolysis and implantation of inferior vena cava filter. The control group were given the conventional nursing intervention, and the observation group were treated by the comprehensive nursing intervention. The improvement in the D-value of thigh and calf circumference before and after treatment, quality of life scores, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the improvement in the D-value of thigh and calf circumference after treatment was more significant（P〈0.05）. The overall quality of life scores were（80.24±6.71） points in the observation group, which were much higher than those in the control group（P〈0.05）. The incidence of complications was 2% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion For patients with deep vein thrombosis, catheter thrombolysis with inferior vena cava filter implantation therapy and comprehensive nursing intervention have significant clinical effect.