期刊文献+

东亚儒家教育哲学新探 被引量:9

Educational Philosophy of East Asian Confucianism: A New Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在东亚儒家教育哲学中,"教育"是一种内省的自得之学,是一种"为己之学",教育的目的在于激发"自我主体性的觉醒"。东亚儒家教育哲学建立在其人性论的基础之上,认为人"心"具有价值判断能力,人的"心"是价值意识的创发者,故教育可以转化并提升学习者的生命。儒家教育哲学的人性论基础,涉及两个理论问题:"心"与"理"之关系,以及"知"与"行"之关系。儒家的教育方法特重"心的淬炼",并强调"心的淬炼"必须在具体情境中经历考验,才能"下学而上达";儒家教学也重视近师长,并因材施教。中、日、韩等地的传统儒家书院学规,集中论述了儒家教育理念在书院的落实。展望21世纪,唯有融贯"出乎其外"与"入乎其内"的教育方式,才能透过"自我的转化"扩而充之,达到"世界的转化"。 According to the educational philosophy of East Asian Confucianism,education,aimed at'awakening one's moral subjectivity',is an introspective'learning for oneself'. The educational philosophy of East Asian Confucianism is based on its the-ory of human nature: The'mind-heart'of human beings is capable to make value judgments and even it is the originator of value awareness,so that education can transform and elevate the life state of a learner. This involves two theoretical issues,that is,the relationship between'mind-heart'and'principles',and the relationship between'knowing'and'acting'. Educational methods of Confucianism emphasize the'refining of mind-heart',claiming that the 'refining of mind-heart'must be achieved in concrete circumstances,without which it cannot 'examine human affairs and natural matters to master the principles of nature'. Confucian education also highlights a close relationship between students and teachers and appropriate teaching methods in accordance with students' talents. The regulations of traditional Confucian academies in China,Japan and Korea reflect the implementation of Confucian educational ideals. Looking forward into the future,we claim that only a successful combination of an'external'and an'internal'approach in education can pave the way from the'transformation of self'to the'transformation of the world'.
作者 黄俊杰
出处 《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期35-45,168-169,共11页 Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 东亚儒家 教育哲学 为己之学 书院 East Asian Confucianism educational philosophy learning for oneself traditional Confucian academies
  • 相关文献

参考文献56

  • 1伊藤仁斋.《论语古义》.关仪一郎编.《日本名家四书诠释全书》.东京:凰出版,1973,第3卷,论语部一,(总论),页4.
  • 2伊藤仁斋.《童子问》.《近世思想家文库》,东京:岩波书店,1966,1988,页205
  • 3清·王先谦.《荀子集解》,台北:艺文印书馆,2000年.
  • 4刘宗周.《论语学案》,台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986年影印文渊阁四库全书本,卷1,第1页.
  • 5LaoSze-kwang,"OnUnderstandingChinesePhilosophy:AnInquiryandaProposal,"inRobertA.Allinsoned.,UnderstandingtheChineseMind:ThePhilosophicalRoots(HongKong:OxfordUniversityPress,1989),pp.265-293.
  • 6劳思光.《对于如何理解中国哲学之探讨及建议》,《中国文哲研究集刊》创刊号(1991年3月),第89-116页.
  • 7DavidCarr,"Education,ContestationandConfusionsofSenseandConcept,"BritishJournalofEducationalStudies,Vol.58,No.1(March,2010),pp.89-104.
  • 8DavidCarr,MakingSenseofeducation:AnIntroductiontothePhilosophyandTheoryofEducationandTeaching(LondonandNewYork:RoutledgeFalmer,2003),p.3.
  • 9Chun-chiehHuang,"Mencius'EducationalPhilosophyandItsContemporaryRelevance,"EducationalPhilosophyandTheory,Vol.46,No.13(December,2014),pp.1462-1473.
  • 10朱熹.《四书章句集注》.中华书局,2005年版,第293-294页.

同被引文献107

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部