期刊文献+

伦理讨论对气候变化辩论的影响

原文传递
导出
摘要 对社会政治价值和伦理价值在气候研究中的非认知价值的态度,在当今学界主要分为中立主义者派和内在伦理学派。中立主义者们希望科学保持价值中立,而内在伦理学派主张社会政治和伦理价值之间存在紧密联系,认为将价值属性完全归属到社会和政治领域是不可能的,因此应强调伦理探讨在气候问题研究的作用。两派观点都无法完全合理解释伦理学在社会和政治问题中的角色。文章认为虽然科学没有被赋予社会政治和伦理价值特权,但这些价值仍然在决定如何抗击全球变暖的决策中起到重要作用,应该建议社会和政治建构衡量标准,在强大有力和适时调整之间寻找一个合适的平衡点。
出处 《社会科学战线》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期1-5,共5页 Social Science Front
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Pielke, The Honest Broker: Making Sence of Science in Policy and Polistics, Cambridge: Cambridge Oniversity Press, 2007; Lachey, '" Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy," U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Papers, pp. 142, 12-17. http ://digitalcommons. unl. edu/do/search/? q = author_ lname% 3 A% 22Lackey% 22% 20AND% 20author_ fname% 3A% 22 Robert% 22&start = 0&context = 52045 &sort = date _ desc , last accessed June 1 st, 2014.
  • 2Betz, "In defence of the value free ideal," European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3, pp. 207 -220.
  • 3Parker, " Values and Uncertainties in Climate Prediction, Revisited," Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, published online 2013. Pielke, "Lessons from 50 Years of Science Advice to the US President," in P. Weingart & G. G. Wagner ( eds. ), Wissenschaftliche Politikbero atung im Praxistest, Weilers-wist : Velbriick, 51-65, Morrison, "Values and Uncertainty in Simulation Models," Erkenntnis 79, pp. 939-959.
  • 4Kitcher, Science in a Democratie Society, Amherst: Prometheus, 2011, pp. 61-62.
  • 5Ben-Haim, lafo-Gap Decision Theory. Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty, Kidlington/Amster-dam: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 37-39.
  • 6Carrier, Martin, "Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Expertise: Epistemic and Social Conditions of their Trustworthiness," Analyse und Kritik 32, 2010, pp. 195-212.
  • 7Droste-Franke et al. Improving Energy Decisions, Towards Better Scientific Policy Advice for a Safe and Secure Future Energy System, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015, pp. 10-12.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部