期刊文献+

北京地区草莓灰霉病菌的转座子及其分布频率 被引量:2

Presence and frequency distribution of transposable elements in Botrytis cinerea from strawberry in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解北京地区草莓灰霉病菌的转座子类型及其分布,本研究用转座子Boty和Flipper的特异性引物对北京地区2012-2013年从12个草莓园采集和分离的60株草莓灰霉病菌进行PCR扩增。结果表明,北京地区草莓灰霉病菌群体中共存在3种转座子类型:transposa型、Boty型和Flipper型。其中,以transposa型菌株最多,占供试菌株的63.3%,Boty型菌株占供试菌株的28.3%,Flipper型菌株最少,仅占8.4%,未检测到vacuma型菌株。选取属于不同转座子类型的18株菌株测定其对草莓叶片的致病力,结果显示Boty型菌株所致病斑的平均直径显著大于Flipper型。草莓灰霉病菌转座子类型与致病力的关系有待进一步研究。转座子类型的检测为进一步研究灰葡萄孢的遗传多样性及遗传变异提供了基础。 This study was conducted primarily to investigate the presence and frequency distribution of the transposable elements Boty and Flipper in populations of Botrytis cinereafrom12 strawberry gardens in Beijing.A total of 60 isolates were collected from diseased strawberry fruits during 2012-2013,and the presence of transposable elements was analyzed by specific PCR.The results showed that there were three types(transposa,Boty and Flipper)of transposable elements.The transposatype isolates carrying both elements were predominant with frequency of 63.3%,and both Boty type and Flipper type isolates were present with low frequencies of 28.3% and8.4%,respectively,while vacuma type isolate was not detected in this study.The pathogenicity analysis of 18 isolates selected from three types demonstrated that Boty type isolates showed the highest pathogenicity to strawberry leaves,with the larger lesion size than Flipper type and transposa type isolates.The relationship between transposon types and pathogenicity of B.cinerea is needed to study.Detection of transposable elements provides the bases for further study of genetic diversity and variation in B.cinerea.
出处 《植物保护》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期177-181,197,共6页 Plant Protection
基金 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303025) 北京市教委-科学研究与研究生培养共建项目(201502911110426)
关键词 草莓 灰葡萄孢 转座子 Boty Flipper strawberry Botrytis cinerea transposon Boty Flipper
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Mass JL.草莓病虫害概论[M].张运涛,张国珍,译.第2版.北京:中国农业出版社,2012.
  • 2Dean R, Van KanJ A L, Pretorius Z A, et al. The top 10 fun- gal pathogens in molecular plant pathology [J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012, 13(4) : 414 - 430.
  • 3Martinez F, Blaneard D, Lecomte P, et al. Phenotypie differ- ences between vaeuma and transposa subpopulations of Botry- tis cinerea [J]. European Journal ot" Plant Pathology, 2003, 109, 479- 488.
  • 4Giraud T, Fortini D, Levis C, et al. Two sibling species of the Botrytis cinerea complex, transposa and vacuma, are found in sympatry on numerous host plants [J]. Phytopathology, 1999, 89(10): 967-973.
  • 5Giraud T, Fortini D, Levis C, et al. RFLP markers show ge netic recombination in Botryotinia f uckeliana ( Botrytis cinerea ) and transposable dements reveal two sympatric species [J]. Molec- ular Biology and Evolution, 1997, 14(11): 1177- 1185.
  • 6Diolez A, Marches F, Fortini D, et al. Boty, a long-terminal- repeat retroelement in the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis ci nerea [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61 (1) : 103 - 108.
  • 7Levis C, Fortini D, Brygoo Y. Flipper, a mobile Fotl-like transposable element in Botrytis cinerea [J]. Molecular and General Genetics, 1997, 254(6): 674- 680.
  • 8Ma Z, Michailides T J. Genetic structure of Botrytis cinerea populations from different host plants in California[J]. Plant Disease, 2005, 89(10) 1083-1089.
  • 9Vdczy K Z, Sdndor E, KaraIfa L, et al. Sexual recombination in the Botrytis cinerea populations in Hungarian Vineyards [J]. Phytopathology, 2008, 98(12) 1312- 1319.
  • 10Samuel S, Veloukas T, Papavasileiou A, et al. Differences in frequency of transposable elements presence in Botrytis cinerea populations from several hosts in Greece[J]. Plant Disease, 2012, 9(96): 1286- 1290.

二级参考文献50

  • 1王昆,沈友康,郑江,沈亚萍,王其礼,刘锦生.蚕豆赤斑病流行趋势预报的模糊识别模式研究[J].植物病理学报,1995,25(3):279-284. 被引量:5
  • 2刘少华,陆金萍,朱瑞良,戴富明.一种快速简便的植物病原真菌基因组DNA提取方法[J].植物病理学报,2005,35(4):362-365. 被引量:123
  • 3礼茜,严蕾艳,童英富,孔樟量,洪文英,李红叶.浙江两地区草莓灰霉病菌(Botrytis cinerea)对扑海因的抗药性及其分子机制[J].果树学报,2007,24(3):344-348. 被引量:22
  • 4张静.湖北省灰霉病病菌区系和灰葡萄孢菌多样性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
  • 5Alghamdi S S,Migdadi H M,Ammar M H,Paull J Q Siddique K H M.Faba bean genomics:current status and future prospects. Euphytica,2012,186(3):609-624.
  • 6Harrison J G The biology of Botrytis spp.on Vicia beans and chocolate spot disease-a review.Plant Pathology,1988,37(2):168-201.
  • 7俞大级.蚕豆病害.北京:科学出版社,1979.
  • 8Zhang J,Wu M D,Li G Q,Yang L,Yu L,Jiang D H,Huang H C,Zhuang W Y.Botrytis fabiopsis,a new species causing chocolate spot of broad bean in central China.Mycologiai 2010,102(5):1114-1126.
  • 9Williamson B,Tudzynski B,Tudzynski P,van Kan J A.Botrytis cinerea:the cause of grey mould disease.Molecular Plant Pathology,2007,8(5):561-580.
  • 10Mirzaei S,Mohammadi Goltapeh E,Shams-Bakhsh M,Safaie N,Chaichi M.Genetic and phenotypic diversity among Botrytis cinerea isolates in Iran.Journal of Phytopathology,2009,157:474-482.

共引文献35

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部