期刊文献+

胆囊结石采用常规手术和腹腔镜微创手术治疗的效果和预后分析 被引量:3

The Effect of Routine Operation and Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Gallbladder Stone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析胆囊结石采用常规手术和腹腔镜微创手术治疗的效果。方法回顾性分析106例胆囊结石患者的临床资料,各53例。对照组采取常规手术治疗;观察组采取腹腔镜微创手术治疗,综合评价患者的临床治疗效果及预后。结果两组患者的临床总有效率对比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组手术时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、术后恢复时间均短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两种手术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果相当;腹腔镜微创手术的手术短、恢复快、术中出血量及并发症少,创伤性小,预后良好,安全性高。 Objective To analyze the effect of routine operation and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of gallbladder stone. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 106 cases of patients with gallbladder stone, 53 patients treated with routine surgery were taken as control group. Another 53 patients treated with laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery were taken as observed group, the clinical treatment effect and prognosis of the patients were evaluated. Results The total clinical effective rate of two groups had no significant difference(P0.05). But the observation group operating time, postoperative recovery time were significantly shorter than the control group, two groups of data had significant difference(P0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of two kinds of surgical treatment of gallbladder stones are considerable. The operation of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery is short, fast recovery, and the amount of blood loss, complications, and the prognosis is good, and the safety is high.
机构地区 解放军
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第8期123-124,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 胆囊结石 常规手术 腹腔镜微创手术 The gallbladder stones Conventional surgery Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1张成,安东均,马富平,董浩,晁延军.十二指肠镜、腹腔镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(2):151-152. 被引量:26
  • 2应福明,冯雪峰,范天逸,陈秉烈,周善学,朱永明.十二指肠镜、腹腔镜序贯治疗胆石症2248例分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(7):551-553. 被引量:26
  • 3张雷达,王曙光,别平,陈平,董家鸿.不同方式的腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗胆总管结石的临床前瞻性研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(5):474-477. 被引量:54
  • 4王立新,彭颖,徐智,侯纯升,凌晓锋,陆少美,张同琳,周孝思.胆总管结石的内镜治疗[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(1):43-45. 被引量:37
  • 5Williams E J, Green J, Beckingham I, et al. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut, 2008,57 (7) :1004 - 1021.
  • 6Cotton PB, Lehmang V, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complication and their management and attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc, 1991,37 ( 8 ) :383 - 393.
  • 7NIH state of the science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanereatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements,2002,19 ( 1 ) : 1 - 26.
  • 8Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi, T, et al. Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrcatugraphy panereatitls by and endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent. Clin Gastrocnterol Hepato1,2007,5 ( 11 ) : 1339 - 1346.
  • 9Bhattacharjee DP, Dawn S,Nayak S,et al.A comparative study between palonosetron and granisetron to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoseopic cholecystectomy [J] .J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2010,26(4):480- 483.
  • 10Salani R,Bristow RE.Surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer [J/ .Clin Obstetrics Gynecol,2012,55(1) 75-95.

共引文献99

同被引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部