期刊文献+

央地分权与公共文化服务:韩国的失败与光州市的崛起 被引量:1

Central-Local Power Allocation and Public Cultural Services: The Failure of Korea and the Rise of Gwang-ju
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共服务近年成为政策重点领域,而央地权力分配对公共服务的影响仍有待研究。本文以韩国公共文化服务项目为例,探讨优化公共服务的央地权力分配模式。通过韩国整体在集权与分权制度下公共文化服务项目发展的对比,以及韩国整体与光州市个体在分权制下的公共文化服务项目的对比,本文揭示,中央集权虽可实现公共文化服务的迅速配给,但中央控制对公共文化服务实际起到抑制作用,而地方分权也不能为公共文化服务提供积极的地方条件,不涉及联动民主化的地方分权是不完全分权,只有结合了强大公民社会力量的联动民主化的地方分权才是优化公共文化发展的关键。韩国的经验与教训对中国有着重要启示。 Public service has recently become critical policy focus, but the study on the impact of power allocation on it is still blurry. The article uses the public cultural development in Korea as a case to study the model of power allocation better off public service. Through comparative study between the public cultural service project development before and after centralized and decentralized system in Korea, between the situation of Korea in general and Gwang-ju in specific, the article reveals that neither system guarantees the development of public culture, since controlling centralization system will suppress it and decentralization will further weaken it. It has been discovered that decentralization without democratization is incomplete decentralization, and only decentralization with powerful civil society and grass root social structure can accelerate the development of public culture. The lessons and experience of South Korea will definitely enlighten the development of public services including public cultural service in China.
作者 蒋绚
出处 《城市观察》 2016年第2期136-146,共11页 Urban Insight
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划2015年度一般项目"广东城市创新驱动发展研究--因素 机制与路径"(GD15CGL06) 教育部人文社会科学规划一般项目"风险规制体制的国际比较"(13YJA810009)
关键词 央地分权 公共文化服务 韩国 光州 central-local decentralization public cultural service Korea Gwang-ju
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Park J. , 2010, Democracy and Civil Society in Korea, Arke.
  • 2Parker A., 1995, Decentralization: the way forward for rural development? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
  • 3Rondinelli D., 1980,"Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice indeveloping countries", International Review of Administrative Science, 2(47).
  • 4Graves J., 2004, Cultural democracy: The arts, community, and the public purpose, University of Illinois Press.
  • 5Mayer M., 1992, "'The Local Urban Political System" in Mick Dunf0rd and Grigoris Katkalas (eds), Cities and Regions in the New Europe, Belhaven Press.
  • 6Park J., 2010,Democracy and Civil Society in Korea, Arke.
  • 7Tanzi, V.,1995, Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects, Paper Presented at Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics.
  • 8Bird, R., Ebel, R., and WaUich, C.,1995, Decentralization of the Socialist State: Intergovernmental Finance in Transition Economies. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
  • 9Isham, J. and Kahkonen, S.,1999, What Determines the Effectiveness of Community- Based Water Projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia on Demand Responsiveness, Service Rules and Social Capital. Mimeo. University of Maryland.
  • 10Cheong K., 2007, A Study on Legislation to Promote Cultural Welfare, Korea Culture and Tourism Research Institute.

二级参考文献26

  • 1郭灵凤.欧盟文化政策与文化治理[J].欧洲研究,2007,25(2):64-76. 被引量:69
  • 2丹尼尔A雷恩.管理思想的演变[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1986.321-325.
  • 3宋文玉 吴理财.使农村公共文化服务运转起来--什么是农村公共文化服务以及如何改善.武汉大学学报:人文社会科学版,2011,.
  • 4Littoz-Monnet,A.2007,The European Union and Culture: Between Economic Regulation and Euro- pean Cultural Policy,pp. 21-36.
  • 5Manchester: Manchester University Press. Mulcahy, E. V. 1998, Cultural patronage in compar- ative perspective: Public support for the arts in France,Germany,Norway,and Canada. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, winter, 27 (4): 247-263.
  • 6Cummings,M. C. and Katz,R. S. 1987,Government and the arts: An overview. I n: Cummings,M. C. and Katz,R. S. (Eds.), 1987,The Patron State: Gov- ernment and the Arts in Europe, North America, and Japan,pp. 3-16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Hillmann-Chartrand,H. and McCaughey,C. 1989, The Arm's Length Principle and the arts: An inter- national perspective-past,present,and future. In: Cummings,M. C. and Schuster,J. M. D. (Eds.).1989,Who's to Pay for the Arts? The International Search for Models of Support, pp. 43-80. New York: ACA Books.
  • 8田洁菁 林泳能.“从福利体制探讨台湾文化政策对地方文化馆发展之影响”[J].博物馆学季刊,2010,.
  • 9[英]托尼·本尼特.文化与社会[M].广西师范大学出版社.2007:163.
  • 10陈威.大力推进文化创新,增强文化发展活力--2008年深圳市公共文化服务体系发展报告//李景源,陈威主编.中国公共文化服务发展报告(2009)[M].社会科学文献出版社,2009:147.

共引文献199

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部