期刊文献+

俄罗斯人权观念的变化对其介入危机方式的影响 被引量:2

Change of Russian Human Right Concepts and Influences on Russian Involvement in the Crisis
原文传递
导出
摘要 人权在冷战后的发展历程中,出现了人道主义干涉、保护的责任等新概念。围绕这些概念以及人权与主权关系的激烈争论,不仅反映了各国人权观念上的差异,也不同程度地影响着各国的人权观。俄罗斯的立场和做法反映了其人权观念的变化。在主权范围内保护本国公民和外国公民的基本权利,已成为俄罗斯的重要人权观念,并在实践中不断得到落实。而保护在境外的本国公民以及他国公民的人权观念,在被俄罗斯逐步接受的同时,却也成为俄罗斯武力介入地区危机的正当理由之一。在俄格冲突、乌克兰危机和叙利亚危机中,俄罗斯在解释其武力直接介入危机的原因时,都使用了人权保护的相关概念,也反映了其人权观念的变化。俄罗斯人权观念的变化影响了其介入危机的方式,也影响了俄罗斯的对外政策和外交行为。 Since the Cold War, such new concepts as humanitarian intervention and responsibility to protect have emerged. Heated debates, regarding these concepts in addition to relations between human rights and sovereignty, not only reflect differences of each country's human rights concepts, but also affect each country's human rights views to different degrees. It has become Russia's important concept of human rights to protect the basic rights of citizens at home and abroad within its sovereignty and to continuously put it into practice accordingly. Meanwhile, when Russia gradually accepts the concept of protecting human rights of Russian and foreign citizens outside Russian territory,this has also become one of the legitimate causes for Russian military involvement in regional crisis. During the Russia-Georgia conflict, the Ukraine Crisis and the Syria Crisis, when Russia explains its motives for direct military involvement in the crisis, it has employed related concepts of human fights protection, which also reflects the changes of its concept of human rights. The changes of Russian concept of human fights have affected its ways of involvement in crisis, which also affects Russian foreign policies and diplomacy.
作者 顾炜
出处 《俄罗斯研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期135-156,共22页 Russian Studies
关键词 人权保护 保护的责任 危机介入 乌克兰危机 叙利亚危机 Human Rights Protection, Responsibility to Protect, Involvement in Crisis, the Ukraine Crisis, the Syria Crisis
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

二级参考文献128

  • 1龙太江.西方民主政治中的妥协精神[J].文史哲,2005(2):156-161. 被引量:9
  • 2左凤荣.俄罗斯的民族传统与普京的强国战略[J].中共中央党校学报,2007,11(3):85-90. 被引量:4
  • 3尤光付.《中外监督制度比较》,商务印书馆2005年版,第31页.
  • 4[苏]B.M.马诺辛等.《苏维埃行政法》,群众出版社1983年版,第237页.
  • 5《Крэнежтт пъс "рсзттёьи сзёьеьл еызслзьзцзби ыз ызилвмль ёвьлтлщв шеазвьвд Роррийскй Фвзцеивс"》.http://www, saratov, gov. ru/government/departments/ombudsman/institut, html, 2006/11/20.
  • 6Marten Oosting, 'The ombudsman and his einvironment: A global view' ,Linda C. Reif(ed. ) ,The International Ombudsman Anthology, Kluwer Law Lnternational, 1999, p11.
  • 7Кицуиле звль "Ислзчльзвъ ёзцёвьзль ыеицьвзиаьц бз збызцбзчеь зцёвьзиль ицёнзеунт иежзмзцёб", http://www. saratov, gov. ru/government/departments/ombudsman/in- stitut, html,2006/11l/20.
  • 8周艳梅.《我国信访制度陷入四重困境面临法治挑战》,http://www.sina.com.cn,2004年07月03日.
  • 9“世界伊斯兰阵线对犹太人和十字军的圣战宣言”,[英]《阿拉伯圣城报》,1998年2月23日.
  • 10戴维·卡莱欧著 冯绍雷等译.《欧洲的未来》[M].上海人民出版社,2003年版.第41-45页.

共引文献87

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部