期刊文献+

单音指示词与双音指示词的功能差异——“这”与“这个”、“那”与“那个” 被引量:27

Functional Differences Between Single Syllable Demonstratives and Their Compound Formations in Mandarin Chinese—A Case Study on Zhe/Zhege and Na/Nage
原文传递
导出
摘要 在指称功能方面,"这"和"那"的独立指称能力远不及"这个"和"那个"。表现为:作为代名词使用的时候,"这"和"那"在"把"字结构和"被"字结构的使用受限;做主语的时候,"这"和"那"都可以不指称个体性对象,用作语篇指,"这"还可以指言谈当下的状态或当下时间等;作为饰名成分使用的时候,"这"与"这个"、"那"与"那个"的饰名功能差异更为显著;语篇中引入一个新的言谈对象时,倾向于用"这+名词"直指现场对象,而"这个、那个"类双音节形式用在名词前时,其功能在于指别。"这"与"这个"、"那"与"那个"在指称功能、指示范畴扩展及篇章功能方面都存在显著差异。 In this paper,the functional differences of Mandarin demonstratives are displayed by means of a comparison of the single syllable forms with their respective compound formations.It is suggested that single syllable demonstratives zhe and na have limited referential ability both in post verbal object position and in the ba-construction and bei-construction,whereas their compound formations zhege and nage can refer to an individual entity independently.As demonstrative adjectives,zhe and na are constraint in use when they occur in a coordinate phrasal modifier.When used as a modifier,zhe contributes to establishing an entity into the immediate situation rather than tracking an individual referent in previous text as what zhege does.While na has recognitional use in a noun phrase,it can not be replaced by the compound formation nage.Furthermore,the functional extensions of zhe and na are very different from their compound formations in deictic function and referential behavior.
作者 方梅
出处 《世界汉语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期147-155,共9页 Chinese Teaching in the World
关键词 指示词 单音节 双音节 指称功能 饰名功能 范畴扩展 demonstratives single syllable compound formation deictic function referential behavior functional extension
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献56

共引文献474

同被引文献219

引证文献27

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部