期刊文献+

混合方法论视野下的民族旅游研究

Research on Ethnic Tourism from the Perspective of Mixed Methodology
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为混合方法论的哲学基础,实用主义指出用"二分法"的态度来判断定量研究与定性研究的优劣是对科学的误解;社会科学研究的不同范式不仅可以相容,更适用于尚未成熟的学科。然而,已有部分研究将混合方法视为定量研究与定性研究的"随意"结合,忽略了在实用主义范式下混合方法论有其自身的研究路径和模式。结合民族旅游研究,围绕"什么是混合、为什么混合、如何混合"这一主线,系统梳理和评述混合方法论中的关键问题,指出民族旅游研究中混合研究设计的类型,其重要意义在于唤起研究者的"问题意识",或将成为推进本土化研究和学科建设的突破口。 Pragmatism, the philosophy basis of mixed methodology, points out that it would be a misconception about science to simply judge quantitative research and qualitative research with the attitude of dichotomy. Actually, different research paradigms of social science research can be not only compatible with each other, but also more suitable for those yet--to--be mature disciplines. However, some studies regard mixed methodology as the random combination of quantitative research and qualitative research and neglect the fact that mixed methodology has its own research path and pattern in pragmatic paradigm. Focusing on "what, why and how to mix", this paper criticaUy reviews the key problems of mixed methodology in the context of ethnic tourism research. According to the paper, the significance of the types of mixed research design in ethnic tourism research lies in arousing the problem consciousness of the researchers, which may provide a possible solution for localization research and discipline construction in tourism science.
作者 刘冰
出处 《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期127-131,共5页 JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"嵌入性视角下联盟组合多样性与企业绩效关系研究"(项目编号:71302098) 广东省自然科学基金项目"联盟组合多样性 网络嵌入性与企业绩效"(项目编号:S2013040016692) 2015年广州市哲学社会科学"十二五"规划课题"自贸区背景下广州现代服务业集聚发展与对策研究"(项目编号:15Q02)
关键词 民族旅游 混合方法论 研究范式 问题意识 ethnic tourism mixed methodology research paradigm problem consciousness
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Guba E G, Lincoln Y S. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Re- search]A]. Denzion, Denzin N K, Lincoln Y S (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research[C]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
  • 2Howe K R. Against the Quantitative-qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard[J]. Educational Researcher, 1988, 17(8).
  • 3House E R. Integrating the Quantitative and Qualitative[A]. Rei- chardt, CS, Rallis, SF(eds). The Qualitative--quantitative De- bate= New Perspeetives[C]. San Francisco= Jossey--Bass, 1994.
  • 4Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(2nd ed.)[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1970.
  • 5[英]马丁·登斯库姆,著,陶保平,等译.怎样做好一项研究一一小规模社会研究指南[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2013.
  • 6Smith, J K. Quantitative versus Qualitative Research An At- tempt to Clarify the Issue[J]. Educational Researcher, 1983, 12 (3).
  • 7Brewer J, Hunter A. Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles[M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
  • 8Greene J C, Caracelli V J, Graham W F. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed--method Evaluation designs[J]. Educa- tional Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989, 11(3).
  • 9Morgan B L. Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research [ J ]. Qualitative Health Research, 1998, 8(3).
  • 10Morse J M. Approaches to Qualitative--quantitative Methodo- logical Triangulation[J]. Nursing Research, 1991, 40(2).

二级参考文献89

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部