期刊文献+

经营者承诺制度在技术标准化反垄断中的适用 被引量:1

Application of Commitment System in Anti-monopoly of Technology Standardization
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术标准化垄断归根结底是标准必要专利的许可问题,我国反垄断执法对其多是处以行政罚款,必要专利的许可价格最终仍由专利权人确定。经营者承诺制度作为反垄断执法中一项重要的和解制度,可以在反垄断调查初期,促使标准必要专利权人纠正其违法行为,减轻或消除垄断行为对竞争的影响,在自愿基础上对标准实施者授予合理的许可价格,并避免了漫长的调查及侵权诉讼带来的成本损失,是一种高效、低成本解决垄断纠纷的制度。因而,经营者承诺制度适用到技术标准化反垄断中具有充分的现实基础。在明确技术标准化垄断行为属于经营者承诺制度的适用范围基础上,从经营者承诺制度的提起主体、申请时间、经营者承诺后的公示制度和听证制度、审查标准、强化对承诺内容的监督以及违反承诺的法律责任等方面,对该制度适用于技术标准化反垄断的具体程序加以完善,将有力地推动技术标准的顺利实施。 Monopoly of technology standardization is ultimately the question of licensing standard essential patents,imposing fine penalties is the common means in Chinese Anti-monopoly law enforcement,patent licensing fees still leave to patentee. As a important reconciliation system in Anti-monopoly enforcement,commitment system is an efficient and low-cost dispute resolving system,which will urge standard essential patentee correcting their illegal activities,relieving or eliminating the adverse effect on competition during the beginning of antitrust investigations,and conferring reasonable licensing fees to standard implementers on voluntary basis,length investigation and losses of infringement actions will be avoided. Therefore,the application of commitment system is full of realistic foundation. On the basis of determining monopoly behaviors of Technology standardization in the application scope of commitment system,this paper will perfect application procedures of commitment system from the subject,time of application,publicity system and hearing system,scrutiny standard,powerful supervision on commitment contents,responsibility of violation commitment,which will promote the smooth implementation of technical standards.
作者 罗蓉蓉
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期94-101,共8页 Law Science Magazine
基金 教育部2013年人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"技术标准化中垄断行为的规制及救济机制研究"(批准号:13YJC820060)资助 "湖南省重点学科建设项目"资助
关键词 经营者承诺 技术标准化反垄断 适用范围 适用程序 commitment system anti-Monopoly of technology standardization application scope of commitment system application procedures of commitment system
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献76

  • 1周琳静,殷继国.误读与澄清:反垄断执法和解制度之本相追问[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(1):62-67. 被引量:5
  • 2丁蔚.Rambus专利侵权诉讼与标准中知识产权的管理[J].电子知识产权,2007(2):45-48. 被引量:6
  • 3Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 FSupp 1116, 6 USPQ 235 (SD NY 1970).
  • 4USM Corp. v. SPS Tech., Inc., 694 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1982).
  • 5Pat Treacy, Sophie Lawrance. FRANDIy fire: are industry standards doing more harm than good? [J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2007, (12): 22-29.
  • 6国家标准化管理委员会国际合作部.ISO/IEC导则[M].北京:中国标准化出版社,2008:31.
  • 7Daniel G. Swanson, William J. Baumol. Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power [J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 2005, (73): 1-58.
  • 8Mark R. Patterson. Inventions, Industry Standards, and Intellectual Property[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2002, 17(3): 1043-1083.
  • 9Patent Reform Act of 2009[EB/OL]. http:llwww.aipla.org/ Content/ContentGroups/Legislative_Action/111 th_Congress 1/Se nate5/S- 515 -intro.pdf, 2010-01-03.
  • 10Anne Layne-Farrar, A. Jorge Padilla Richard Schmalensee. Pricing patent for licensing in Standard-Setting Organizations- Making Sense of FRAND Commitments [J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 2007, 74(3): 671-706..

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部