期刊文献+

中国区域R&D效率变化测度及其影响因素研究 被引量:14

Exploring the Change and Influence Factors of R&D Efficiency at Province-Level of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有的R&D效率研究中存在2个问题:忽略R&D过程内部生产结构;仅仅使用相对有效性作为影响因素研究的因变量。在考虑R&D过程内部结构的同时,综合运用并联DEA模型、Luenberger生产率指数和面板数据模型3种方法,计算具有时序上可比的Luenberger R&D生产率变化指数,并采用面板数据模型的方法对影响R&D效率变化的因素进行研究。研究发现我国各个省份的R&D效率普遍在稳步提升,且R&D效率的提高主要是由"技术进步"引起的。企业已经成为了R&D过程的主体,企业R&D效率的提升对总过程R&D效率提升的贡献最大。经济发展水平(人均GDP)和金融服务对R&D活动的支持(金融环境)是对R&D效率提升影响最大的2个因素。 The existing literature, which focuses on R&D efficiency, has two problems. First, internal structure of R&D process is neglected. Second, the scores of relative efficiency, which cannot be compared between different period, are used as independent variable. By integrating DEA for parallel production system, Luenberger productivity change index and panel data model together, this manuscript considers internal structure of R&D process and calculates Luenberger R&D productivity change index, which can be compared between different periods. The fac- tors which affect R&D efficiency are explored too. We find that each province exhibits an increasing R&D efficiency. The increase of R&D efficiency mainly attributes to 'technical progress'. Enterprises have become main part of R&D process. The increase of R&D efficiency of total-process mainly attributes to the increase of R&D efficiency of the enterprises sub-process. Per Capita GDP and financial environment are the most significant factors which influence the change of R&D efficiency.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期79-88,共10页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
关键词 并联DEA Luenberger生产率指数 面板数据模型 R&D效率 DEA for parallel production system Luenberger productivity change index panel data model R&D efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Romer P M. Increasing returns and long-run growth[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1986,94(5):1002-1037.
  • 2Lucas R E. On the mechanics of economic develop- ment[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988,22(1): 3 -42.
  • 3Aghion P, Howitt P. A model of growth through crea- tive destruction[J]. Econometrica, 1992,60(2):323-351.
  • 4Hasan I, Tucci C L. The innovation-economic growth nexus: Global evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2010,39(10): 1264-1276.
  • 5Jun S P, Seo J H, Son J K. A study of the SME tech- nology roadmapping program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013,80(5):1002-1014.
  • 6Sharma S, Thomas V. Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analy- sis[J]. Scientometrics, 2008,76(3):483-501.
  • 7Rousseau S, Rousseau R. The scientific wealth of Euro- pean nations: Taking effectiveness into account[J]. Scien- tometrics, 1998,42(1):75-87.
  • 8Souza G S, Alves E, Avila A D. Technical efficiency of production in agricultural research[J]. Scientometrics, 1999,46(1):141-160.
  • 9Guan J C, Chen K H. Modeling macro-R&D produc- tion frontier performance: An application to Chinese province-level R&D[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,82(1):165- 173.
  • 10Chen C P, Hu J L, Yang C H. Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change[J]. Scientometrics, 2013,94(3): 833-849.

二级参考文献80

共引文献294

同被引文献177

引证文献14

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部