期刊文献+

高密度标测在器质性心脏病室性心律失常电风暴导管消融中的应用 被引量:4

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmia storm guided by high-density mapping in structural heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价单中心应用多极电极导管进行高密度标测指导器质性心脏病室性心动过速(室速)消融治疗的即刻和远期疗效。方法回顾性分析2014年8月至2015年11月在南京医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科进行消融治疗的14例器质性心脏病室速电风暴患者,平均年龄(49.1±16.1)岁,男12例,女2例。采用20极或10极可控标测导管于EnSite—Velocity(美国圣犹达公司)三维电解剖标测系统导航下行高密度采点标测(包括高密度激动及基质标测)并指导消融。结果14例共接受15次标测及消融,单纯行心内膜途径7次,联合心内膜及心外膜途径8次,术中共诱发或自发28种室速,平均周长为(358±107)ms,18%为血流动力学不稳定性室速或蜕变为心室颤动(室颤)。所有患者均行窦性心律(13例)或起搏下(1例)高密度基质标测,8例心内膜及心外膜联合途径消融者经高密度标测发现,其心外膜病变区域(包括瘢痕区、病变移行区及低电压区)显著大于心内膜(P值均〈O.05),术中平均x线曝光时间(37.6±7.6)min,手术总时间(227±34)min。消融治疗即刻完全成功率、部分成功率及失败率分别为53.3%、26.7%及20.0%,总体有效率为80.0%。所有患者均无严重手术并发症发生。于末次消融术后平均随访(8.2±3.6)个月,1例患者因严重心力衰竭于术后2周内死亡。远期完全成功率、部分成功率及失败率分别为84.6%、7.7%及7.7%,总体有效率92.3%。结论应用多极标测导管行高密度标测可较为准确地锁定器质性心脏病室速相关基质部位及关键传导通道,依此指导消融可有效控制电风暴平Ⅱ/或室速发作。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of high density mapping using muhielectrode cathe- ters and EnSite-Velocity system ( St. Jude Medical, US. ) for guiding radiofrequency ablation of ventricnlar ar- rhythmia storm(VAS) in structural heart disease.Methods Fourteen VAS patients [ 12 men ,mean age( 49.1 ± 16.1 )years ] with structural heart disease were retrospectively analyzed.Endoeardial and/or epicardial high den- sity mapping was performed with a steerable duodecapolar or decapolar catheter during the ventricular tachyear- dia(VT) and/or the baseline rhythm ,either sinus or paced ,with EnSite-Velocity system.Results A total of 15 mapping and ablation procedures were performed in 14 patients.Seven of them were performed only through en- docardial approach.Combined endocardial and epicardial approach were carried out in other 8 procedures.The abnormal substrate areas in epicardium were significantly larger than that in endocardium.Twenty-eight types of VT( including 18% hemodynamically unstable VT or degenerated to ventrieular fibrillation)were induced or spontaneous during the procedures [ mean cycle length( 358± 107 ) ms ] .The average X-ray fluoroscopy time and procedural time were ( 37.6± 7.6) rain and ( 227 ± 34) min, respectively. Complete success, partial success, and failure rates immediately post ablation were 53.3 %, 26.7 % and 20. 0%, respectively. During a mean follow-up of (8.2±3.6)months after the last ablation procedure,one patient died from severe heart failure after discharge in 2 weeks.The lang-term complete success,partial sueeess ,and failure rates were 84.6% ,7.7% and 7.7%, re- speetively.Conclusion The VT substrates and/or channels could be effectively deteeted and ablated by high density mapping via using multielectrede catheters and EnSite-Velocity system.
出处 《中华心律失常学杂志》 2016年第1期15-20,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
关键词 高密度标测 导管消融 室性心动过速 室性心律失常电风暴 High density mapping Catheter ablation Ventricular tachycardia Ventricular arrhythmia storm
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1MallidiJ, NadkarniGN, BergerRD,et al.Meta-analysis of catheter ablation as an adjunct to medical therapy for treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease[J].Heart Rhythm,2011,8(4):503-510.DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.015.
  • 2NakaharaS, TungR, RamirezRJ,et al.Characterization of the arrhythmogenic substrate in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy implications for catheter ablation of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,55(21):2355-2365.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.041.
  • 3JaisP, MauryP, KhairyP,et al.Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities:a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia[J].Circulation,2012,125(18):2184-2196.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043216.
  • 4VallesE, BazanV, MarchlinskiFE.ECG criteria to identify epicardial ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2010,3(1):63-71.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859942.
  • 5SoejimaK, SuzukiM, MaiselWH,et al.Catheter ablation in patients with multiple and unstable ventricular tachycardias after myocardial infarction:short ablation lines guided by reentry circuit isthmuses and sinus rhythm mapping[J].Circulation,2001,104(6):664-669.
  • 6HsiaHH, LinD, SauerWH,et al.Characterization of endocardial substrate for hemodynamically stable reentrant ventricular tachycardia:identification of endocardial conducting channels[J].Heart Rhythm,2006,3(5):503-512.
  • 7余金波,杨兵,徐东杰,陈明龙,单其俊,邹建刚,陈椿,侯小锋,张凤祥,陈红武,居维竹,李新立,曹克将.心律转复除颤器植入术后电风暴的发生及其对预后的影响[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2011,15(3):190-194. 被引量:11
  • 8BogunF, GoodE, ReichS,et al.Isolated potentials during sinus rhythm and pace-mapping within scars as guides for ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47(10):2013-2019.
  • 9CarbucicchioC, SantamariaM, TrevisiN,et al.Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibribrillators:short and long-term outcomes in a prospective single-center study[J].Circulation,2008,117(4):462-469.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.686534.
  • 10StevensonWG, SagerPT, NattersonPD,et al.Relation of pace mapping QRS configuration and conduction delay to ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in human infarct scars[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1995,26(2):481-488.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Douglas PZ, D. George W, Peter L, et al. The Antiarrhythmic versus Implantable Defibrillators ( AVID ) Investigators : Acomparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in pa- tients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med,1997,337 : 1576-1583.
  • 2Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, et al. Randomized comparison ofantiarrhythmic drug thempy with implantable defibrillators in pa- tients resuscitatal from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hambeg(CASH). Circulation,2000,102 : 745-754.
  • 3Credner SC, Klingenheben T, Mauss O, et al. Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators: incidence, management and prognostic implications. J Am Coil Car- dio1,1998,32 : 1909-1915.
  • 4Gatzoulis KA, Andrikopoulos GK, Apostolopoulos T, et al. Electri- cal storm is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome in the era of implantable defibrillator therapy. Europace, 2005,7: 184-192.
  • 5Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med, 2008,359 : 1009-1017.
  • 6Exner DV, Pinski SL, Wyse DG, et al. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defib- rillators(AVID) trial. Circulation ,2001,103 : 2066-2071.
  • 7Sesselberg HW, Moss A J, McNitt S, et al. Ventricular arrhythmia storms in postinfarction patients with implantable defibrillators for primary prevention indications: a MADIT-Ⅱ substudy. Heart Rhythm,2007,4 : 1395-1402.
  • 8Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Marrouche NF, et al. Prevalence, predic- tors, and morfality significance of the causative arrhythmia patients with electrical storm. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2004,15: 1265- 1270.
  • 9Huang DT, Traub D. Recurrent ventricular arrhythmia storms in the age of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: a com- prehensive review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2008,51 : 229-236.
  • 10Muller JE, Ludmer PL, Willich SN, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of sudden cardiac death. Circulation, 1987,75: 131-138.

共引文献10

同被引文献17

  • 1周益锋,郭继鸿,许原,李学斌,张萍.单极和双极心内电图的比较[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(3):359-360. 被引量:1
  • 2KatzDF, TurakhiaMP, SauerWH,et al.Safety of ventricular tachycardia ablation in clinical practice:findings from 9 699 hospital discharge records[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2015,8(2):362-370.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002336.
  • 3TungR, VaseghiM, FrankelDS,et al.Freedom from recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation is associated with improved survival in patients with structural heart disease:an International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group study[J].Heart Rhythm,2015,12(9):1997-2007.DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.036.
  • 4IzquierdoM, Sanchez-GomezJM, Ferrero de Loma-OsorioAF,et al.Endo-epicardial versus only-endocardial ablation as a first line strategy for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2015,8(4):882-889.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002827.
  • 5PhilipsB, te RieleAS, SawantA,et al.Outcomes and ventricular tachycardia recurrence characteristics after epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy[J].Heart Rhythm,2015,12(4):716-725.DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.018.
  • 6SantangeliP, ZadoES, SuppleGE,et al.Long-term outcome with catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2015,8(6):1413-1421.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003562.
  • 7DinovB, AryaA, SchratterA,et al.Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia and mortality in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy:can noninducibility after ablation be a predictor for reduced mortality?[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2015,8(3):598-605.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002295.
  • 8YokokawaM, KimHM, BaserK,et al.Predictive value of programmed ventricular stimulation after catheter ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2015,65(18):1954-1959.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.058.
  • 9de RivaM, PiersSR, KapelGF,et al.Reassessing noninducibility as ablation end point of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia:the impact of left ventricular function[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2015,8(4):853-862.DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002702.
  • 10Di BiaseL, BurkhardtJD, LakkireddyD,et al.Ablation of stable VTs versus substrate ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy:the VISTA randomized multicenter trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2015,66(25):2872-2882.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.026.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部